в общем дап здесь буду если чо постить какую-то доп инфу по осам подсосам если она появится!! а картинки на основу
❤🔥2🥰2👏1

Channel
@arrowecho
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002426366508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arrowecho |
| Description | инфа про моих оᴄ! ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ ᴄ ʍоиʍи ᴋᴀᴩᴛинᴋᴀʍи: https://t.me/wuullpy ᴀнон: @wuullpy_bot |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arrowecho |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 47 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 47 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 20 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
121 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 39 | 32.2% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5440356501711511886 | 12 | 9.92% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 9.92% | |
| custom 5443098288574199922 | 11 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5264797548823995865 | 8 | 6.61% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 5.79% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 4.96% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 2.48% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.65% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
в общем дап здесь буду если чо постить какую-то доп инфу по осам подсосам если она появится!! а картинки на основу
❤🔥2🥰2👏1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🍓1👏1
гайсики я думаю оставить этот канал как архив+склад анкет и прочей инфы по персам и выкладывать все порисули в основу а то кабута тут немножко поумирали все а на основе я и другие пикчи выкладываю по фд и не по фд чо думаете!!
🍓4❤🔥1👏1
ну было же
🍓1👏1
#yuyama #другиеос
❤🔥1🍓1👏1
всех кстати с наступившим!! я не умерла
🍓5👏1
в тт пошёл тренд с фотобашингом персов и я тож решила сделать мою малышечку😳😳 #вулпи
🍓6custom 54430982885741999224👾3👏1
редрав старого фьюза юмико и юямы!!🤩 #вулпи #Oc
🍓7❤🔥3👏1
✨✨🥰✨✨🥰 Еще скетчи с драконами потому что я не могу остановиться их рисовать 🌺Все связанно на моем сеттинге. На первом зарисовала Киришиму и в целом для сравнения его вид драконов, правда думаю людей все же надо сделать побольше. На втором, третьем скетче изображен Кири и Сэцуко (ос Джемми), на четвертом скетче тренировалась с ракурсом морды и под руку попалась Юмико (ос Вулпи). Начинаю наконец-то рисовать дизайны др…
🍓2custom 52647975488239958652custom 54403565017115118862custom 54430982885741999222👏1
❌❌❌✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ ❌✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ 🎃 юмико в костюме blood riot ака злодейская версия red riot🫀 #вулпи
custom 54403565017115118869🎉6custom 54430982885741999225🍓1👏1
показываю оску которую я сделала для одного симпатичного оса другого челика😇 #Oc
❤🔥5🍓4👏1custom 54403565017115118861
(она бы вытянула соплю ещё длиннее и мерилась с ним)
🍓3🐳1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @arrowecho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 641,141 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴄᴋᴧᴀд ᴄᴛᴩᴇᴧ” (@arrowecho), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arrowecho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.