Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

aries issues ️️️🎫

@arriesissues

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

237subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781814629
TypeChannel
Username@arriesissues
DescriptionМеня зовут Хван Дже, но ты можешь звать меня Император.
Created5 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/arriesissues

Growth

2376 Aug 2026, 19:50 — 237 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:45 — 237 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:507 Aug 2026, 02:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 236–238 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:45237no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:50237first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,870
Videos
434
Links
227

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52470219676760381812644.8%
custom 52423665023000503671729.3%
custom 5197601776160755441813.8%
custom 5402613617604447777712.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 21:47 UTC236 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все кто хочет на концерт бантанчиков, очень вайбовое предложение для вас 🤩

custom 52423665023000503671

29 May 2026, 21:47 UTC265 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @goQoukkaJ

💜Собираю компанию на BTS в Бангкок! 💜 Я подумала, что если собрать людей и поехать в это путешествие, прожить весь этот невероятный момент всем вместе?🤍 Поэтому хочу собрать небольшую группу и организовать поездку в Таиланд на концерт BTS в декабре! В поездку планируется включить: ✨перелёт ✨проживание ✨трансфер ✨страховку ✨помощь с организацией поездки ✨совместные прогулки и программу в свободное время Сейчас я с

27 May 2026, 12:46 UTC254 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Устроил террор в груминг салоне и думает как оттяпать мне лицо 🐈‍⬛

custom 524702196767603818120

19 May 2026, 14:25 UTC302 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @unknowncss3Photo

эта риальна касплей на Дже ну правда, я так сильно люблю этот ее образ, что даже дюраг купила и буду носить. это стиль. Дже – трендсеттер 🤩

custom 54026136176044477777custom 51976017761607554412custom 52423665023000503672

30 Apr 2026, 12:14 UTC334 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @memmememememmwme

ебать адф файнали жди

custom 52423665023000503671

29 Apr 2026, 17:39 UTC268 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Она сказала да 💕

custom 52423665023000503677

24 Apr 2026, 18:08 UTC286 viewsread 7 August 2026

Никакая песня не заставит меня чувствовать столько же, сколько эта:

24 Apr 2026, 18:08 UTC355 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Создатели «Дьявол носит Prada 2» так заморочились с продвижением, что к премьере сверстали полноценный выпуск журнала «Подиум», в редакции которого работают главные герои фильма. Специально для номера написали статьи и провели профессиональные фотосъемки. По незнанию все это легко перепутать с реальным глянцем. ломали пятую стену и случайно построили модную империю 🔥 #кинопакет

custom 52470219676760381816

17 Apr 2026, 16:01 UTC267 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tctprojectVideo

Хэппи лучший лидер🥃ХванДже🥃 дэй!!! Потрясающую большую женщину поздравляем с ее днем рождения Оставайся такой же стильной, модной, вайбовой и крутой девушкой🌟 Любим 🌟

custom 52423665023000503676custom 51976017761607554411

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @arriesissues. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 784,940 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“aries issues ️️️🎫” (@arriesissues), 237 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arriesissues.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.