Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ARPA Official Announcement

@arpaannouncement

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

289subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001232745746
TypeChannel
Username@arpaannouncement
Created22 July 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/arpaannouncement

Growth

2892912906 August 2026 — 291 subscribers6 August 2026 — 291 subscribers13 August 2026 — 289 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 289–291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:14289-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:48291no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:42291first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.82%
avg views ÷ 289 subscribers
Avg views / post
8.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total163
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC5 viewsread 6 August 2026

Public blockchains are great for transparency But not every computation belongs fully in public Web3 needs privacy-preserving infrastructure too https://t.co/zz27w8sA44 https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2085161682712903720

5 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC5 viewsread 6 August 2026

Finally some good news https://t.co/4m7UkQQsxr https://t.co/8SBst6lJOj https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2084791745381072969

4 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026

☀️ ARPA Network Summer 2026 Progress Report is here. This season was about pushing verifiable infrastructure forward: from BLS-TSS research and ARPA AVS growth to the development of Archive of Fate and new Randcast ecosystem collaborations. 🎲🔐 We’re continuing to expand the https://t.co/4adnoFrKSU https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2084431622338937270

3 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026

The agent economy needs more than intelligence, it also needs trust, transparency, and verifiable performance. 🤖 Excited to see @MossAI_Official launch the FAT Protocol and push forward a new era where AI agents can be created, proven, and owned on-chain. Together, we’re https://t.co/s0Srl5Llm2 https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2084225777529397266

2 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026

🗂️Archive of Fate launches with three worlds: modern, cultivation, and western fantasy. Each world is more than a different skin. It changes the kind of life you are entering. Modern runs are shaped by family, money, health, work, relationships, pressure, and timing. https://t.co/qmCdpi8ePD https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2083918743131021729

31 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC10 viewsread 6 August 2026

🗂️Archive of Fate is built around a simple loop: Start a life. Receive a world. Choose talents. Allocate attributes. Watch the run unfold. Get a title and life summary. Decide whether to preserve it. The interesting part is that not every memorable run needs to be successful. https://t.co/wJpMZboKL8 https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2083193212429119909

31 Jul 2026, 00:26 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026

A random number generator is only as good as its trust assumptions. Randcast reduces the “just believe us” part and replaces it with cryptographic verification. 🎲📜 https://t.co/tTKM66d7lf https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2082985845309550854

29 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026

What if your digital fate was verifiably random? 🎲 In our latest article, we share the story behind Archive of Fate: an AI-powered fate simulation game built with ARPA Randcast. From ancient fortune-telling concepts to next-generation Web3 gaming, discover the idea behind the https://t.co/9zb7rUk8p9 https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2082472966076727455

29 Jul 2026, 00:11 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔐 New collaboration announcement! ARPA Network is partnering with @layeredge to explore the intersection of decentralized verification and cryptographic infrastructure. Together we'll work to strengthen the foundation of a trust-minimized Internet powered by cryptographic https://t.co/puWZ1DkKWE https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2082256791870865415

28 Jul 2026, 02:31 UTC8 viewsread 6 August 2026

🚀 Excited to collaborate with @SvpChain! SVP Chain is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 with a native on-chain order book and an AI-agent–ready execution layer. Together, SVP Chain and ARPA Network are exploring bringing ARPA Randcast to the SVP ecosystem - providing tamper-proof, https://t.co/fXrJqI0hoj https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2081929636380836070

27 Jul 2026, 00:36 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026

AI Requires Proof Always https://t.co/EGuGEcXyuy https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2081538307339546821

24 Jul 2026, 00:21 UTC12 viewsread 6 August 2026

Threshold cryptography sounds complicated until you realize the idea is simple: no single party should hold all the power. That’s the kind of infrastructure Web3 needs. 🔐 https://t.co/mOjsAK23op https://twitter.com/arpaofficial/status/2080447620271759685

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arpaannouncement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ARPA Official Announcement” (@arpaannouncement), 289 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arpaannouncement.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.