Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

аром4к

@arom4k

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

232subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001878102323
TypeChannel
Username@arom4k
Descriptionсмешной гд креатор слегка в инактиве из-за учебы тупой еще рисую иногда наверное W =
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/arom4k

Growth

2326 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 232 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:47 — 232 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:167 Aug 2026, 02:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:47232no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:16232first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
140.1%
avg views ÷ 232 subscribers
Avg views / post
325
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total6,501
Reactions total120
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
651
Videos
130
Links
92

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53865060814951663287562.5%
custom 53867161526405809021815.0%
custom 53889952942160702481210.0%
custom 538897775786460000797.50%
custom 538643467766387224265.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC127 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

опоп наполеоп это что тут у нас

custom 53889777578646000076

Signed aromik

4 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC110 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

а ВАМ знакомо выражение "не кормите тролля"?...

custom 53889952942160702486

Signed aromik

4 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/3L24DaOQ7Gg?si=MJ1SUCer4qvYcEnD крутой уровень, мифик. второй раз подряд дольфе выдает бест среди вообще всех уровней контеста (конкуренции в принципе и нету, дуалити гаунтлет еще хуже рандома, это пиздец). хотелось бы только увидеть от него что-то поновее, чем одну и ту же идею в разной обертке сотый раз подряд, но всё равно кайф

Signed aromik

2 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC131 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Sin14fitBL4?si=9zqKwKPy18l5gkJo Мифик

Signed aromik

1 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC156 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

гаунтлет контеста успешнее спейса уже никогда не будет

custom 538650608149516632810

Signed aromik

31 Jul 2026, 21:45 UTC138 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ouhr34Video

прог впервые за долгое время чувствую, что в силах что то построить и закончить 👹

custom 53865060814951663288

Signed aromik

30 Jul 2026, 21:08 UTC199 viewsread 7 August 2026

я наконец-то понял что мне очень не понравилось в уровне. я как ценитель транзишенов не увидел за весь уровень НИ ОДНОГО транзишена который не был бы тупо вспышкой/затемнением. это очень скучно, переходы очень важная часть уровня где креатор может разыграться и удивить, а тут такого нету и в помине

Signed aromik

29 Jul 2026, 22:34 UTC205 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

мой прогноз: сегодня там будет шоукейс найн серклз

custom 53889952942160702486

Signed aromik

29 Jul 2026, 22:08 UTC216 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

поздравляю минея с мификом. заслуженно? скорее да чем не да

custom 538650608149516632814

Signed aromik

29 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC891 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

это пиздец

custom 538650608149516632811

Signed aromik

27 Jul 2026, 00:18 UTC509 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

я уже жду не дождусь показать над чем я работал весь последний год и еще буду какое-то время работать, но готовьтесь, я локд ин

custom 538650608149516632811

Signed aromik

26 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,240 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

просто никогда не меняйте гравити прямо посреди геймплея, либо весь парт на гравити либо мини фиксы с его помощью, но когда он меняется в рандомных моментах это никогда не читается

custom 538650608149516632811

Signed aromik

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arom4k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 188,042 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“аром4к” (@arom4k), 232 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arom4k.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.