Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вмп/тактическая медицина🪖⛑

@army_dock

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,410subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001625287355
TypeChannel
Username@army_dock
Created19 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/army_dock

Growth

5,4015,4105,405.56 August 2026 — 5,401 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,402 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,406 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,410 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,400–5,411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:545,410+4
9 Aug 2026, 14:115,406+4
6 Aug 2026, 07:105,402+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:375,401first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 5,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
779
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (20 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total14,027
Reactions total311
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

218 reactions across 11 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6529.8%
4319.7%
🔥3817.4%
2411.0%
💯188.26%
🤔52.29%
🙏41.83%
🤷‍♂41.83%
🌚31.38%
🐳31.38%
👏31.38%
🤬31.38%
🤯20.917%
😢10.459%
😭10.459%
🤨10.459%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC448 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Обещал развить мысль про направления борьбы с состоявшимся кровотечением. Много букофф и иногда медицинские термины. Кровопотеря — это состояние, с которым человечество сталкивалось на протяжении всей своей истории: на полях сражений, во время родов, при травмах и болезнях. Потеря даже относительно небольшого объема циркулирующей крови запускает каскад компенсаторных реакций, но когда резервы организма исчерпаны,

👍15👏3🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC377 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Наидобрейший тренд с российских дорог: байкеры начали сопровождать машины скорой помощи и распихивать пробку перед ними. Один из активных участников всей этой прелести рассказывает: они впечатлились работой мотополиции Европы, которая помогает местным скорым, и решили делать так же. Если видят скорую, которая застряла в пробке, — выезжают вперёд, газуют, стучат в стёкла спящим, призывают активно перестраиваться и ус

👍176🤔1🤨1

5 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC499 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А куда опять делся 95й и 92й?

🤷‍♂4🌚3🤔3

4 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC547 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кворум не собрался , переносим

😭1

4 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC619 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Давненько у нас стримов не было, поговим сегодня в 23.00?

  1. Да49%
  2. Нет10%
  3. Ты чоооо, я спать буду51%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC670 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @prozdoroviesbuynim

Как мне вчера сказали, самым отвратительным сегодня будет утро у железнодорожника, который служил в ВДВ. Шутка прошла мимо, хотя вчера был двойной праздник, а сегодня у нас прямо вал обращений за помощью из разряда плохо-пил... Как же всё-таки бороться с похмельем, не уничтожая организм? Погнали! Борьба с похмельем — это не столько лечение уже наступившего состояния, сколько комплекс мер, направленных на детоксикац

11👍8🐳1

2 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC667 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥215😢1

1 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC799 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

По поводу взрыва в Москве ничего комментировать не буду, там разбираются компетентные люди, но вот, что хочу сказать: не знаю как так получается, но ВСЕГДА НАХОДЯТСЯ КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ ИДИОТЫ, КОТОРЫМ БОЛЬШЕ ВСЕХ НАДО, не смотря на запреты и распоряжения, на видео представитель оных представлен альтернативно одаренным индивидом на самокате. Всех выводят за оцепление, но ему надо проехать.... Кто бы им рассказал сколько т

💯18👍3🤬31🤔1

31 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC701 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В следующем посте рассмотрим варианты восполнения кровопотери.

👍43

31 Jul 2026, 04:06 UTC≈2,470 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня поговорим про соотношение кровопотери и адекватности работы головного мозга. Коротко, емко с цифрами. Соотношение кровопотери и когнитивных функций: нейрофизиологическая катастрофа Головной мозг — самый энергозависимый орган. Составляя лишь 2% массы тела, он потребляет 20% кислорода и глюкозы, циркулирующих в крови. Эта особенность делает когнитивные функции критически уязвимыми к любому снижению перфузии.

134🙏4🤯2👍1

29 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC765 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @prozdoroviesbuynim

Сегодня поговорим про такую вещь, как энергетический ресурс организма. Откуда в нем берется энергия, за счет чего преобразуется и кто за что отвечает. Итак, приступим. В основе жизнедеятельности любого организма, от одноклеточной амебы до сложного человеческого тела, лежит непрерывный процесс преобразования энергии. Мы привыкли воспринимать энергию как нечто абстрактное, измеряемое в калориях или джоулях, но для б

👍17114

26 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC863 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥169🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @army_dock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTCAnonymous Poll61 voters

Давненько у нас стримов не было, поговим сегодня в 23.00?

  1. Да49%
  2. Нет10%
  3. Ты чоооо, я спать буду51%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 40,839 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вмп/тактическая медицина🪖⛑” (@army_dock), 5,410 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/army_dock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.