Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐€๐‘๐‰๐”๐ ๐๐‡๐€๐ˆ โ™ ๏ธ

Channel

๐€๐‘๐‰๐”๐ ๐๐‡๐€๐ˆ โ™ ๏ธ

@arjunspecials

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

441subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001705406292
TypeChannel
Username@arjunspecials
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/arjunspecials

Growth

440441440.59 September 2026 โ€” 440 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 440 subscribers19 September 2026 โ€” 441 subscribers9 September 202619 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 440โ€“441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:01441+1
9 Sept 2026, 18:22440no change
9 Sept 2026, 17:47440first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
36.1%
avg views รท 441 subscribers
Avg views / post
159
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.91%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held19 (30 August 2026 โ€“ 9 September 2026)
Views total3,028
Reactions total179
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค5329.6%
๐Ÿ˜˜3016.8%
๐Ÿฅฐ2916.2%
๐Ÿ˜2514.0%
๐Ÿ‘2413.4%
โšก42.23%
๐Ÿ”ฅ31.68%
๐Ÿ˜31.68%
โ˜ƒ21.12%
๐Ÿซก21.12%
๐ŸŽ‰10.559%
๐Ÿ‘10.559%
๐Ÿ™‰10.559%
๐Ÿคฉ10.559%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @avengerstossline

๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ ENGLAND ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ WON THE TOSS AND CHOSE TO BOWL FIRST โœ”๏ธโœ”๏ธ

๐Ÿฅฐ2๐Ÿ˜2โค1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

9 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC35 views9 reactionsread 9 September 2026

ENGLAND ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ

โค6๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

8 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC64 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

LETSS GOOOOOO

๐Ÿ˜˜5๐Ÿ˜3โค1๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

8 Sept 2026, 08:20 UTC73 views13 reactionsread 9 September 2026

HELLLO๐Ÿบ BACHOOOOOOOOOO

โค5๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿฅฐ3๐Ÿ™‰1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

8 Sept 2026, 03:10 UTC75 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026

DUPHAR TK PAUCH JAUNGA

โค5๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿซก1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

7 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC93 views9 reactionsread 9 September 2026

NEPAL M FSA HU๐Ÿบ๐Ÿ’€

โค6๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿซก1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

3 Sept 2026, 14:09 UTC188 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Hlw

โค5๐Ÿฅฐ3๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

1 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC231 views8 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘5โค1๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

1 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC236 views8 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

KUCH HISSA COVER KR KIYA

โค4๐Ÿ˜˜2๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

1 Sept 2026, 03:13 UTC247 views8 reactionsread 9 September 2026

DLS KI BAKCHODI ๐Ÿบ

๐Ÿฅฐ5๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

31 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC237 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026

2:30 BJA CPL H YAARO BAHUT ACHA MATCH HONE K UPDATE AAYA H

โค4๐Ÿ˜3๐Ÿฅฐ2๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

31 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC216 views9 reactionsread 9 September 2026

AAJ CHUTI P

๐Ÿ‘4โค2๐Ÿ˜˜2๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—๐—จ๐—ก ๐—•๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @arjunspecials. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

๐™ด๐š‡๐™ฟ๐š๐™ด๐š‚๐š‚ ๐™ผ๐™ฐ๐šƒ๐™ฒ๐™ท ๐™ป๐™ด๐™ฐ๐™บ๐™ด๐šโšก
@LEAKEREXPRESS_MATCH_LEAKER ยท 24,198
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 16 here โ€” alongside 15 others โ€” read 16 September 2026
๐‘๐š๐ฆ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐๐ซ๐š๐ง๐๐Ÿ—ฝ
@Winning_Zone09 ยท 29,210
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 24 here โ€” alongside 23 others โ€” read 9 September 2026
เฒธเณเฒฆเณเฒฆเฒฟ เฒ•เฒฐเณเฒจเฒพเฒŸเฒ•
@suddikarnataka ยท 28,372
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 46 here โ€” alongside 45 others โ€” read 9 September 2026
Sikke Ka Badshah [ 2019 ]
@Tosskingrazz ยท 23,460
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 32 here โ€” alongside 31 others โ€” read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐€๐‘๐‰๐”๐ ๐๐‡๐€๐ˆ โ™ ๏ธโ€ (@arjunspecials), 441 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arjunspecials.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.