Channel
@aririsu21
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
155subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003245159129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aririsu21 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 12 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aririsu21 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 155 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 155 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (12 November 2025 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 276 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
764 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5456609924974918742 | 265 | 34.7% | |
| custom 5269353246404648709 | 246 | 32.2% | |
| custom 5321444933347854610 | 103 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5373329744601292149 | 88 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5371101867755446871 | 62 | 8.12% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 764reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aririsu21. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 November 2025 to 18 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👁 Не поверите кто решил снова начать рисовать и развивать ОСов Извиняюсь за годовое отсутствие, но я снова в строю!!! Очень жду комментариев, репостов, и всего всего, что порадует мое сердце и даст знать, что вы меня не забыли! Я очень скучала. Люблю. 👁
custom 545660992497491874219custom 537332974460129214913custom 526935324640464870910custom 53214449333478546102custom 53711018677554468712
Помогите придумать ей имя🫥
custom 526935324640464870921custom 54566099249749187428custom 53733297446012921496custom 53214449333478546102
🙏🖤🖤🖤☦🖤🖤🖤🙏 Зимняя депрессия позади, впереди только религиозный психоз... 🌟Раз в год и я фанарты рисую. Буду рада, если всем пяти людям, смотревшим стрендж фейк понравится эта картинка. Буду супер рада репостам, комментам и тд. Мне необходимо больше фанатов насуверса на этом канале. 🙏🖤🖤🖤☦🖤🖤🖤🙏
custom 526935324640464870925custom 532144493334785461011custom 53733297446012921498custom 54566099249749187421
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 -УВИДИМСЯ НА СЛЕДУЮЩЕЙ НЕДЕЛЕ, ДОРОГИЕ ЮНЫЕ ТЕЛЕЗРИТЕЛИ, НЯ!1! ВСЕМ МУР МЯВ!!!1! - Эм...ты вообще в порядке? ✅Я очень ОЧЕНЬ долго не могла закончить эту работу. Но я смогла, и надеюсь в ближайшее время порисовать ещо.
custom 526935324640464870924custom 545660992497491874213custom 537110186775544687110custom 53214449333478546105
Залетаю в последний вагон. Днём дроп
custom 53711018677554468714custom 54566099249749187421
🐱КОНКУРС КОТОВ✨ Задача - Нарисовать Чаки в компании вашего ОС используя образ КошкоДеток! 🐱Формат >цветной арт (дидж/традиш) >От одного участника - 1 работа >По желанию можно изменять фон, ракурс и позу персонажа >Важно сохранить образ! (одежду Чаки и вид котов) >Арт по плечи минимум! Но по желанию можно сделать больше 🐱ДЛЯ УЧАСТИЯ: 1.Подписка на канал 2.Репост в ТГК/Пиар-Чат/2 друзьям - Пруф скинуть в коменты 3.Гото…
custom 53711018677554468716custom 54566099249749187422custom 52693532464046487091
Чета лень стало дальше рисовать. Думаю так и оставлю. Эксперименты с покрасом можно признать неудачными
custom 526935324640464870923custom 532144493334785461011custom 54566099249749187427custom 53733297446012921494
Кусочки всякого
custom 545660992497491874228custom 537110186775544687112custom 53214449333478546108custom 52693532464046487095
🌟Напоминаю про вчерашний дроп. Потыкайте там кнопочки по-братски. И держите спойлер милой доброй кошочки
custom 545660992497491874227custom 526935324640464870914custom 53711018677554468714custom 53733297446012921491
ДВА АРТА ЗА ДЕНЬ. Жду похвалы и проглаживаний😇
custom 526935324640464870934custom 545660992497491874216custom 53214449333478546109custom 53733297446012921492custom 53711018677554468711
🔠🔠🔠 Пытаюсь найти время, а также вернуть себе желание рисовать. Вот и начиркала гифт для знакомой. А МОЖЕТ ТЕПЕРЬ РИСОВАТЬ ЧИБИ?🤡🤡🤡
custom 545660992497491874227custom 537110186775544687111custom 532144493334785461010custom 53733297446012921493custom 52693532464046487091
НАША КАРТИНОЧКА Как же давно я не участвовала в таких штуках, и как же забавно это было. Спасибо Сенарду и Еве за этот опыт. С Наступающим!🥺
custom 526935324640464870923custom 537332974460129214914custom 54566099249749187429custom 53214449333478546102
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aririsu21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 201,109 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@aririsu21 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“a r i r i s u 2 1” (@aririsu21), 155 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aririsu21.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.