Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙠𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙙🖤

@ariforkreed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

138subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002388106516
TypeChannel
Username@ariforkreed
Descriptionдᴏбᴩᴏ ᴨᴏжᴀᴧᴏʙᴀᴛь ʙ уюᴛный ᴛᴦᴋ ᴨᴩᴏ ᴇᴦᴏᴩᴀ🤍 ʍᴏй ᴛиᴋ ᴛᴏᴋ-www.tiktok.com/@ariforkreed ᴀнᴏн-https://t.me/anonimnyye_voprosy_bot?start=61rmf ʍᴏй ᴧᴀйɸ ᴛᴦᴋ-https://t.me/arishkamc3
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ariforkreed

Growth

1387 Aug 2026, 17:23 — 138 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:00 — 138 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:238 Aug 2026, 23:00
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:00138no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:23138first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 138 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (13 April 20264 August 2026)
Views total15
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,310
Videos
1,410
Links
562

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 12m
Average length
12m 05s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52175741042315993751340.6%
custom 5404335444223618891928.1%
custom 5402495424399435279412.5%
custom 5433822610913777522412.5%
custom 521564934899764097026.25%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kunoichiaepVideo

👅👅☑️давай:)) 🌟 ⊹ ac : soulcuvs . . ✨ 𓆠 ۫ 🌟 ᭝ ܰ ៳ׄ ֢˖ tiktok ִֶָ 🌟🌟 ⁀ ‌ ָ ࣪ ،‌،‌֠ ֪ 𓂁 ֙. ⋆. • ☑️☑️#myedits ☑️📸: krisss066🙈☑️ ☑️

31 May 2026, 23:46 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026

⭐️переходите в тгк, там сейчас много новостей, фоток с стрима 🌟 https://t.me/envykreed 🌟 https://t.me/envykreed 🌟 https://t.me/envykreed

21 May 2026, 08:44 UTC77 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @envykreedVideo

🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⭐️🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️реакции,репосты приветствуются 😌 ⭐️ тикток 🤩 ⭐️📸 |alinkinszz 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠

21 May 2026, 00:18 UTC144 viewsread 8 August 2026

ps : тут скоро новый эдит егору 🌟🌟🌟 🌟https://t.me/envykreed 🌟https://t.me/envykreed 🌟https://t.me/envykreed

14 May 2026, 17:52 UTC57 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kunoichiaepVideo

— ну красивый, красииивый.. 👅 рандом вкид с этим метро, но такойййй классный)) ждем тебя уже на концертеее 🩷 [ tiktok / inst ] #myedits 📷 : nastias192002

custom 52175741042315993753

28 Apr 2026, 20:05 UTC90 viewsread 8 August 2026

🌟переходите в новый телеграмм 🌟🌟 🌟https://t.me/envykreed

27 Apr 2026, 11:29 UTC75 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kunoichiaepVideo

— не верится что тут снова Егор Крид.. 🫧 было сложно представить что снова сделаю ему эдит...🤲 [tiktok / inst] #myedits 🌟 :alinkinsz

18 Apr 2026, 21:11 UTC93 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌟родные подписывайтесь на новый тгк!! там все новые новости,фоточки

custom 52175741042315993752custom 54043354442236188912

17 Apr 2026, 20:45 UTC94 viewsread 8 August 2026

🌟https://t.me/envykreed 🌟https://t.me/envykreed 🌟https://t.me/envykreed

16 Apr 2026, 18:03 UTCviews —

𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙠𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙙🖤 pinned «ребята, у меня для вас новость 🌻 я создала новый телеграм-канал про Егора — envykreed решила начать с чистого листа, но всё так же остаюсь в фандоме и никуда не пропадаю если вы хотите дальше следить за моим телеграмом,и контентом про Егора - переходите…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ariforkreed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙠𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙙🖤” (@ariforkreed), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ariforkreed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.