Channel
@arghavandevelopment
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003259058733 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arghavandevelopment |
| Description | ارتباط با مدیر: @Fatemeerjb |
| Created | 8 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arghavandevelopment |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 52 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 52 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (8 November 2025 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 73 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
53 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 33 | 62.3% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 30.2% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 7.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مراقبت از شمعهای روشن در باد گزارش فعالیتهای ارغوانِ توسعه در زمانهٔ جنگ، فعالیتهایی که تلاشی بود برای پشتیبانی از کنشگرانی که در نقاط مختلف ایران مشغول کاری برای حمایت از جامعه بودند. @ArghavanDevelopment
🔥4❤2👍2
چند روز پیش، در جمعی کوچک اما صمیمی از کنشگران اجتماعی، از تجربهٔ فعالیت در روزهای جنگ گفتیم. ما از تجربهای گفتیم که برای ارغوان توسعه(که آن موقع هنوز اسمی برایش انتخاب نکردهبودیم)، تمرینی عملی برای یک ایدهٔ مهم بود: در بحران هم لازم نیست همهچیز را از نو و از مرکز ساخت. میتوان به کنشگرانی اعتماد کرد که از پیش در میدان حضور دارند، نیازها و آدمها را میشناسند و خودشان دست به کار شدهاند؛ و به جای جایگزینشدن با آ…
❤4
«ناتوانمندسازی» سالهاست از «توانمندسازی» حرف میزنیم. هر جا فقیری باشد، آموزشی طراحی میکنیم. هر جا مسئلهای باشد، پروژهای تعریف میکنیم. هر جا نیازی باشد، خدمتی ارائه میکنیم. و هر بار، با رضایت از خودمان میپرسیم: «چقدر توانمند شدند؟» اما شاید سؤال دیگری هم وجود داشته باشد. آیا ممکن است همان چیزی که نامش را توانمندسازی گذاشتهایم، آرامآرام توانِ مردم را از آنها گرفته باشد؟ توانایی همیشه با منع کردن از بی…
👍6
Channel name was changed to «ارغوان توسعه»
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «ارغوان توسعه|کنشگری واژگونشده»
از کنشگری واژگونشده، تا ارغوان توسعه اول میخواستم اسمش را بگذارم «واژگون»، به همان دلایلی که قبلا از آن نوشتهام، اینکه از جایی شروع میکنیم که خلاف معمول است و روند متفاوتی را پیش میبریم. چند بار هم اسم واژگون را برایش استفاده کردم اما متوجه شدم که برداشتی که آدمها از این نام دارند مثبت نیست. مدتی بعد که دیگر تنها نبودم و تیممان تشکیل شده بود باز هم به اسم فکر کردیم. حالا اسمش را گذاشتهایم «ارغوانِ توسعه» ار…
❤3
وقتی مردم میگویند: «خودمان انجام دادیم»… سالهاست این جملهی منسوب به لائوتسه برایم الهامبخش بوده: «به پیش مردم برو، در میان آنان زندگی کن، از آنان یاد بگیر و به آنان عشق بورز... و بهترین رهبران کسانی هستند که وقتی کار تمام شد، مردم بگویند: خودمان این کار را انجام دادهایم.» راستش را بخواهید، تا حد زیادی هم تلاش کردم به آن عمل کنم. در بسیاری از فرایندهایی که همراهش بودم، همین اتفاق افتاد: کار پیش رفت، مردم درگیر …
❤3👍2
چرا مشارکت، بدون تنش، عقیم میشود؟ اگر در یک فرایند مشارکتی هیچ تنشی وجود ندارد، احتمالاً مسئلهای هم واقعاً روی میز نیست. ما معمولاً از مشارکت، تصویری آرام و همدلانه داریم: آدمها دور هم مینشینند، حرف میزنند، به تفاهم میرسند. اما واقعیت این است که هرجا پای منافع، تجربههای متفاوت و نابرابری در میان باشد، تعارض اجتنابناپذیر است. حالا اگر این تعارض دیده نشود چه میشود؟ بخش مهمی از پاسخ برمیگردد به نقش تسهیلگر. …
❤2👍2
واقعیتِ چه کسی به حساب میآید؟ «واقعیت» یک امر ذهنی است یعنی در یک موقعیت مشترک، در اذهان مختلف، واقعیتهای متفاوتی ادراک میشود. پذیرش این جمله، پیشنیاز پرداختن به هر پژوهش کیفی یا اقدام مشارکتی است. در پژوهش کیفی تلاش میکنیم که به معناهای ذهنی افراد و جوامع مورد مطالعه دست پیدا کنیم. در اقدام مشارکتی، فراتر از دست پیدا کردن به معناها، کمک میکنیم این معناها به مرحلهٔ عمل برسد. اما عنوان این متن، که عنوان کتابی …
👍4
کتاب آموزش ستمدیدگان نویسنده: پائولو فریره مترجمان: احمد بیرشک و سیفالله داد @ArghavanDevelopment
👍3
این متن خلاصهٔ شاعرانهای از کتاب آموزش ستمدیدگان نوشتهٔ پائولو فریره است. کسی که دیدگاههایش متحولکنندهٔ نگاه به آموزش و پس از آن توسعه محلی بود و بسیاری از ما بدانیم یا ندانیم متاثر از این دیدگاهها هستیم.
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @arghavandevelopment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,031,920 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@arghavandevelopment named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ارغوان توسعه” (@arghavandevelopment), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arghavandevelopment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.