Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Archive Starlette

Channel

Archive Starlette

@archivestarlette

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003768313138
TypeChannel
Username@archivestarlette
CreatedBetween 1 January 2026 and 25 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/archivestarlette

Growth

227 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:3122no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:2122first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘266.7%
133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 May 2026, 17:38 UTC40 viewsread 11 August 2026

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ‧˚⭐️ UPSUBS ˚⭐️ ٬٬ ♡ ᯓ★ Reg 30p/s ⤷ 30 subs : 900p 50 subs : 1.500 100 subs : 3.000 200 subs : 6.000 300 subs : 9.000 400 subs : 12.000 500 subs : 15.000 ᯓ★ Ma 40p/s ⤷ 30 subs : 1.200 50 subs : 2.000 100 subs : 4.000 200 subs : 8.000 300 subs : 12.000 400 subs : 16.000 500 subs : 20.000 ᯓ★ Ba 65p/s ⤷ 10 subs : 650p 20 subs : 1.300 30 subs : 1.950 40 subs : 2.600 50 subs : 3.250 60 subs : 3.900 70 subs

15 May 2026, 11:03 UTC40 viewsread 11 August 2026

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ‧˚⭐️ COIN NITROSEEN ˚⭐️ ٬٬ ♡ ᯓ★ Cnit ⤷ 70p - 80p / kc ᯓ★ T.U Btc ⤷ 62p - 65p / kc n. tanyakan harga & ketersediaan pada admin, sertakan keterangan inrush / non rush order (setiap adm beda harga) FORMAT ORDER CEK KOLOM KOMENTAR 👇👇

23 Apr 2026, 16:36 UTC65 viewsread 11 August 2026

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀‧˚⭐️ GAME NEEDS ˚⭐️ ٬٬ ♡ 𓈒⭐️ ᯓ★ Top Up Free Fire Via Id ⤷ 5 dm : 950p 10 dm : 1.800 12 dm : 2.000 15 dm : 2.900 20 dm : 3.500 25 dm : 4.500 30 dm : 5.400 40 dm : 6.700 50 dm : 7.200 55 dm : 7.700 70 dm : 9.500 75 dm : 10.000 80 dm : 11.000 90 dm : 12.700 100 dm : 13.500 120 dm : 16.000 130 dm : 17.500 140 dm : 18.200 145 dm : 19.000 150 dm : 19.900 160 dm : 21.500 190 dm : 25.000 200 dm : 26.600 210 dm : 27

18 Mar 2026, 09:39 UTC123 viewsread 11 August 2026

rekbernya juga sama sama nipu, tiati yaa, rekberpun bisa nipu

18 Mar 2026, 09:39 UTC132 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

@GadisRekber tiati buat kalian yang di ajakin rekber disini gaiss, @Kawatl tiati juga sama username ini

7 Mar 2026, 05:21 UTC251 viewsread 11 August 2026

gais tiati penipu ya id penipu 8114368878, aku habis dapet laporan.

8 Feb 2026, 12:04 UTC515 viewsread 11 August 2026

👤 8024774555 👦🏻 𝑪 ℛays 𓃠 🇮🇩 Indonesian 🕑 Updated at 08/02/2026 hati hati buat kalian yg di mintain payment sama ini orang ya, dia bukan adm disini jadi cek cek kalau ada adm dari sini yang minta payment ke rc ! n. adm starlette gapernah minta transaksi di rc, kalau ada itu penipuan.

30 Jan 2026, 05:42 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 11 August 2026

💸💸 SEBAR DANA KAGET NIH 💸💸 CEPET KLIK SEBELUM KEHABISAN‼️ 👉 link di bawah EITSSS… KETIPU 😜 TENANG TENANG, JANGAN MARAH. INI LEBIH MANTAP DARI DANA KAGET 😏🔥 KALIAN LAGI NYARI GC RESS YANG MURAH, TRUSTED, DAN GACOR NONSTOP? WELCOME TO GC RESS PALING WARAS DI DUNIA PER-RESS-AN 💥 🔥 HARGA PELAJAR, RASA SULTAN • TELEPREM START 50K • TELESTARS MULAI 3-4K • NOKTEL & NOKOS MURCE • APP PREMIUM SEGUDANG • GAME, BOOST, JASA,

27 Jan 2026, 13:18 UTC691 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀‧˚⭐️ TRANSACTION NEEDS ˚⭐️ ٬٬ ♡ 𓈒⭐️ ᯓ★ Jaspin ⤷ 0 - 999p : FREE 1.000 - 1.999 : 10p 2.000 - 2.999 : 20p 3.000 - 3.999 : 30p 4.000 - 4.999 : 40p 5.000 - 5.999 : 50p 6.000 - 6.999 : 60p 7.000 - 7.999 : 70p 8.000 - 8.999 : 80p 9.000 - 9.999 : 90p 10.000 - 14.999 : 100p 15.000 - 19.999 : 150p 20.000 - 24.999 : 200p 25.000 - 29.999 : 250p 30.000 - 34.999 : 300p 35.000 - 39.999 : 350p 40.000 - 44.999 : 400p 45.00

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @archivestarlette. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Archive Starlette” (@archivestarlette), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archivestarlette.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.