у нас есть тейкбот! @arhivedeltakbot Можете писать все, что думаете, без цензуры Оформление? Не важно 🧃 #щп
❤4👀2

Channel
@archivdelmp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004350375872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @archivdelmp |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 7 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/archivdelmp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 91 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 92 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (7 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 584 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
118 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 28.8% | |
| 👀 | 23 | 19.5% | |
| 🤔 | 22 | 18.6% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 9.32% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 7.63% | |
| 👻 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 😨 | 7 | 5.93% | |
| 😈 | 4 | 3.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
у нас есть тейкбот! @arhivedeltakbot Можете писать все, что думаете, без цензуры Оформление? Не важно 🧃 #щп
❤4👀2
👾Нашла очень интересный видос про Дмитрия Миронова на Ютубе. Там он рассказывает о Марии Петровой, показывает архивную папку ее дела. Ссылка:: тык (кликабельно) Фото из этого видоса.
👀5😈2😱1
Интересное мнение Александра Бухановского (Профессор и знаток маньяков)в интервью: (интервьюер): "—Это касается исключительно мальчиков? "-Да. Маньяк- это всегда мужчина. Это свойство мужского мозга. Я знаю в мировой практике всего 2 случая, когда серийной убийцей стали женщины. С моей точки зрения (по имеющимся у меня описаниям), они в детства развивались как транссексуалки. У этих женщин- мужской мозг. Подобные …
🤔6❤3😍1
Важные детали, которые я вытащила из документального детектива "Вооружена и очень опасна": 1. Когда на нее направляют камеру (предположительно они находятся в участке), Петрова вздрагивает. Ее пальца скрещены в замок. Она сразу поднимает взгляд в камеру, значит тело реагирует быстрее чем разум. Видно, что она напугана. 2. Она говорит связано, но иногда в речи проскальзывает "как бы", "ну, то что", "потому что". 3.…
❤2😈2😱2🤔1
Ещё фотографии Петровой
👀5❤3🤔2
Есть две передачи по истории Марии Петровой. 🚨 Первая снята в 2006 году режиссёром Вахтангом Микеладзе в цикле передач Документальный Детектив. Название: "Вооружена и очень опасна". Повторные показы были в 2008-2011г. Вторая выходила на канале НТВ приблизительно в 2010 году. Это цикл передач "Первая Кровь". Название: "Охотница с ножом и расправы над ночными бабочками". В этой передаче три истории, одна из…
❤5😨2😱1
Ещё бумаги🍼 🍼 Здесь документ Петровой о замене паспорта, 2006 г. #из_материала_дела
👀6👻3🤔1😱1
Недавно читала статью, где была новость о том, что про история Петровой хотят снять фильм в Голливуде. Вот что рассказал Дмитрий Миронов об этом: — Расскажете про проект? — Я был в Америке, где встречался с полицейскими, которые занимаются серийными убийцами. И так получилось, что люди, которые являются официальными спонсорами полиции штата Нью-Йорк, предложили встретиться с продюсером. Ему меня представили. Мы кр…
❤5👻1😨1
Истинные мотивы преступления Зюзинской маньячки: Я могу объяснить, как она пришла к этому. Но я не могу и не хочу оправдывать ее.🤩 🤩Любят на Ютубе писать заголовки видео: "Она убивала ради удовольствия". Я считаю это далеким от правды. Здесь явно прослеживается что-то другое. Да, Петрова безусловно ощущала "удовлетворение" после содеянного, как и любой другой маньяк, ведь пар после того конфликта с мужчиной на раб…
🤔3❤2😱1
Posted without readable text
❤4
🍼Дактилоскопия Марии: 🪽Дактилоскопия (снятие отпечатков пальцев) — способ опознавания человека по следам пальцев рук. 🪽 #из_материала_дела
👀2🤔2❤1👻1
Остановка Театр "Шалом" в настоящее время. Фото из статьи с сайта MSK1.ru
😍3❤2👀2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @archivdelmp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,011,233 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ⳅюⳅυⲏᥴⲕᥲя ⲙаⲏья4ⲕ@” (@archivdelmp), 91 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archivdelmp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.