Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 50 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,597–2,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 07:41
2,607
+7
17 Sept 2026, 06:20
2,600
-1
13 Sept 2026, 08:18
2,601
+2
9 Sept 2026, 21:20
2,599
-6
4 Sept 2026, 09:17
2,605
-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:38
2,607
+1
20 Aug 2026, 00:38
2,606
-5
13 Aug 2026, 11:36
2,611
+2
10 Aug 2026, 04:24
2,609
+5
7 Aug 2026, 00:34
2,604
+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:21
2,603
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:24
2,603
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
73
89.0%
👍
7
8.54%
👏
1
1.22%
🤔
1
1.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ничто так не постоянно как временное
У зданий-долгожителей примерно раз в сто лет начинается период перерождения. Обычно его называют реконструкцией. На это время они прячутся в кокон, чтобы позже превратиться в прекрасную бабочку. Особенно приятно, когда к этому «кокону» относятся с тем же уважением как к полноценному фасаду, а не превращают его в очередной рекламный баннер.
На фото — фальшфасад почтового отделени…
Я знаю, что среди моих подписчиков много студентов-архитекторов, поэтому хочу порекомендовать человека, который может быть вам действительно полезен.
Если вы планируете поступать в магистратуру или на PhD в Европе, но не знаете, с чего начать, или хотите увеличить свои шансы на поступление, рекомендую обратиться к Анастасии.
Она помогает выстроить стратегию подготовки, разобраться с выбором университета, подготовит…
Углеволоконная революция, которая не случилась
Многие помнят, как последние пятнадцать лет Университет Штутгарта активно экспериментировал с углеволокном (carbon fiber). За это время исследователи построили около десятка павильонов (по ссылке один из них), которые регулярно попадали во все архитектурные издания. Причина понятна: новый материал, эффектная архитектура, а производственный процесс превращался в настояще…
Раз уж заговорили про Норвегию, оставлю тут подборку постов ей посвященных:
1. Аффордансы
2. Дома на колесах
3. Феномен Цумтора
4. Preikestolen
5. Долгожители. Каркасные церкви 12 века
6. Туалетная держава
7. Скандинавский красный
8. Здание - инфлюенсер
9. Снохетта
Снохетта
Лайфхак для архитектурных бюро: если хотите однажды построить павильон в красивейшем месте страны — назовитесь в честь этого места. У норвежского бюро Snøhetta этот трюк сработал идеально. Фонд диких оленей заказал им павильон с видом на гору Snøhetta. Правда, совпадение не случайно. Для норвежцев эта гора — почти мифологический символ, поэтому название бюро изначально отсылало к национальному ландшафту и и…
❤29👍1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @architect_thoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
домики @domiki_everyday · 22,318 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Megabudka⋮ @megabudka · 27,152 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
Архитектор Борис Зайцев @zaboris · 65,201 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Archi.ru @archi_ru · 28,027 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Я – Сергей Кузнецов @uragankuznetsov · 37,369 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Через объектив архитектора” (@architect_thoughts), 2,607 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/architect_thoughts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.