hi, kangen
Channel
OFFICIALLY DISBAND
@archerians
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
269subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003528417754 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @archerians |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 8 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/archerians |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 269 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 281 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:20 | 281 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 282 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
42 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 38 | 90.5% | |
| custom 5287341106311213647 | 4 | 9.52% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
@aimellebloom reveal
hiiii
aku kangen kalian
ANNOUNCEMENT hi everyone, Archerians here. after a long discussion and consideration, we’ve decided to officially Disband Archerians starting today. thank you for allthe memories, support, laughter, and moments that we shared together from the very beginning until now. meeting all of you became one of the best parts of this journey. we also want to apologize if there were many mistakes or things that disappointed y…
😭37
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ ㅤ La Möte Dalms-ian. ㅤ 𝙲𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝙾𝚞𝚝 𝙻𝚎𝚎𝚊𝚗 .⃘໋۟ ✺ ㅤ Wrapped In Velvet Spots ㅤ Come Wonder With Us ㅤ Inside This Dalms Haven. ㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
happy mensivee, ceeyi! jangan lupa isi data mensive kalian ya disini
ㅤ✿ ིㅤ𝟷𝟸 / 🏹ㅤ𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗔𝗡𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗥𝗬. ೃ We have tucked another month into our leather bags, carrying the scent of sandalwood and old memories across the dunes. @aehypen, @kyamor, @Luminohyul, @coastina, @keondread, @ivoryoo, @JUHOTZ, and @youngjaeist 𔒱 some days were silent, others felt like a journey without an end. 𝘏𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘺 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺; 📜 – may our paths be blessed with water and 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒑𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆.
link nya disini ceeyis
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⊹ ׅ 𓏲ּ 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗦 𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟 🏹 arrows drawn beneath dim twilight, wandering archers gather in silent glory ⌕
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @archerians. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 760,525 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@archerleeans · 72 postsClawonhie: 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘸 𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘰𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘦! 🐾🎀
@clawonhie · 3,0742 posts[HOLD SFS] 𝖽𝗎𝗅𝖼é𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗇: celestine murmur
@dulcearmeen · 2,4092 postsAHNVENTURE: Swaggin' Trailz
@ahnventure · 2,8151 postBATSEAN (READ PINNED.)
@BATSEANs · 1,5241 post#CallstellaSoIconic 𝓒. callstella! HOLD SFS & HFW.
@CallStella · 3,3511 post[DISBAND] 𝒞aresian: Lunar Blush Beauty
@caresian · 7641 post(HOLD SFS) Chase the Wookie!
@chasewook · 1,5361 post♡ 𝙲. 𝙻𝙾𝙴𝚅 ~ 𝒾an : *.゚𓎟ྀི
@cloevian · 4,7391 postEVONLY: Ever Only Us.
@evonly · 8351 postHŪ$KYIΛN : DISBAND.
@HuskyIan · 4851 post[HOLD SFS] hyunblouse꯱
@hyunblouse · 2,3011 postHYUNICAL 𖡄
@HYUNICAL · 2,4511 postDISBAND, IVORYOO. 🩷
@ivoryoo · 1,4311 post(OPGATE) JEEMISSUE.
@JEEMISSUE · 1,1441 post[HOLD SFS] KËƇRHỢN.
@KECRHON · 3,0381 postDISBAND.
@Keondread · 9701 post[REST] Kyamor. ♥️
@kyamor · 2,8391 post𝘯adote 𓍼ྀི
@nadote · 3,1411 postOHYULITE [HOLD SFS]
@ohyulite · 2,0281 postSCENTIAN, DISBAND.
@scentian · 9081 postFREE LEFT.
@SENHOTEEN · 5881 postVELÖUR-VICKY.
@VelourVicky · 1,7211 post[HOLD SFS] yuselae: lowkey in 𝓁𝑜𝓋𝑒.
@yuselae · 8351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@archerians named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OFFICIALLY DISBAND” (@archerians), 269 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archerians.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.