Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Сначала арбитраж | Потом терапия

@arbitrazhterapiya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

559subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003568094383
TypeChannel
Username@arbitrazhterapiya
DescriptionСначала заработал деньги. Потом понял — какой ценой. 7+ лет внутри арбитража. @Why_echo2 - для связи со мной @HR_HustleTeam_bot - пиши сюда если ищешь работу в арбитражной команде
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/arbitrazhterapiya

Growth

559560559.57 Aug 2026, 18:07 — 560 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:53 — 559 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:34 — 559 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:078 Aug 2026, 03:34
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 559–560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:34559no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:53559-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:07560first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.9%
avg views ÷ 559 subscribers
Avg views / post
212
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,240
Reactions total95
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
100
Videos
31
Links
132

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4547.4%
3132.6%
👍77.37%
💔66.32%
💯44.21%
😁11.05%
🫡11.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тот момент, когда реклама белого тикток-шопа учит арбитражу лучше, чем некоторые курсы Особенно если вы заливаете дейтинг.

🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC127 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Маркировка ИИ-контента в ЕС (AI Act) ❗️ Буквально 3 недели назад я писал о том, что это вопрос времени, когда все обязуют маркировать ИИ-контент, а гугл просто был первой ласточкой. В Европе вступили в силу новые требования. За отсутствие маркировки сгенерированных креативов, дипфейков и нейросетевых ботов компаниям грозят штрафы до €7.5 млн или 1.5% мирового оборота. В связи с этим, все, кто таргетируется на аудит

2🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC142 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Арбитраж — это про быстрые бабки 🤔 Прикол в том, что даже новичок в арбитраже может залутать этак 5к баксов за один месяц. Собственно, именно ради этого в арбитраж и идут в первую очередь. Вот только никто не думает о том, что перед тем, как заработать большую сумму за один месяц, у человека может уйти и полтора года. Мол, вот сейчас научусь, и потом буду стабильно лутать кучу бабок. Ага) Но что еще печальнее, т

💯4🔥41

4 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC169 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Ну что, как вы оцениваете свой Июль? 👀

  1. Удовлетворительно 🥳45%
  2. Неудовлетворительно 😢55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC166 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Моя история. Часть 17. Финал ⭐️ ~Декабрь 2025 Где-то примерно в это время у меня уже появилась идея стартовать канал, но тогда это были просто первые попытки. Первые 3 недели после переезда во Вьетнам, я страдал от бессонницы. Я попал в джетлаг, и мой сон сломался. В Польше я засыпал в среднем в 3-4 утра, а во Вьетнаме это 8-9 утра, то есть на 5 часов вперёд. Так что получалось что ночью я не мог уснуть, а утром

8🔥2👍1

31 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC203 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сайд стори. Перелёт во Вьетнам. ☠️ Самое дорогое во Вьетнаме — это билет туда. Из Польши цена была +- 750$ в одну сторону, если ты берёшь хотя-бы ручную кладь. Перелёт часов 6+8 часов, с пересадкой в дубае. Заказал туристическую е-визу онлайн где-то баксов за 70 и через 3-5 дней, как была виза на руках, взял билет. Я вообще не хотел брать с собой весь свой багаж. Для меня переезд был чем-то вроде переходом в новую

🔥8

30 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC190 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Моя история. Часть 16. Переезд во Вьетнам 💃 ~ Декабрь 2025 Последние пол года у меня прошли в спокойном режиме, без критических изменений. С первой же крупной зарплаты я сразу переезжаю в комфортное жильё. Я нахожу 1-комнатную квартиру за 1200$ + 1500$ залог. И кто-то может подумать: нифига жильё ты дорогое выбираешь.. С одной стороны вроде и деньги появились, так что хотелось пожить чуть более комфортно, но с д

🔥82

29 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC187 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Моя история. Часть 15. Третья золотая эра💵 ~ Май 2025 Мы едем из Румынии в Польшу, 30 часов, автобусом. Временно нас приютил к себе тимлид друга. Пока мы у него жили, я проходил онбординг в компании. Меня берут в команду Hustle Team, одна из веток компании TraffBraza. По-сути у меня не было нормального опыта залива уже как полтора года вообще, а в гембле так и вовсе опыта почти не было, но меня всё равно взяли,

6💔3🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC205 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как я уже писал выше, нынче появились проблемы на рынке трудоустройства в арбитраже, НО, есть нюанс. Вот все говорят, мол на рынке сидит куча безработных баеров, но это не значит, что на самом деле нет работы. Это значит лишь то, что на нынке много слабых специалистов. И это на самом деле вообще не новость. Многие в этой сфере не понимают что они вообще делают. Многих и баерами назвать сложно. Максимум – заливщики

👍6

27 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC228 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Моя история. Часть 14. Луч надежды 🎉 ~ Январь 2025 После ухода из фарма, я нахожу себе лёгкую подработку, не связанную с трафиком, и в целом успокаиваюсь на ближайшие месяца 4. Пока я всем этим занимался, у друга была совершенно другая сюжетная линия. Он ушёл на продукт к приятелю. Можно сказать на него повесили ответственность как за тимлида, потому что приятель протолкнул. Но по-сути реального опыта у него не

🔥5💔1

24 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC251 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вдруг вам интересно как выглядят пальмы в гирляндах

24 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC255 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Моя история. Часть 13. Попытка стать фармером 🤪 ~ Декабрь 2024 В гембловые команды со ставкой без опыта меня никто не берёт, а идти в стартапы за процент у меня желания не было. Поэтому решил себе так, что мне нужна какая-нибудь максимально простая работа, с минимальной ответственностью; без необходимости активно думать головой; работа, с которой справится любой школьник; и при этом чтобы платили стабильно ставку.

🔥7💔1🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arbitrazhterapiya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

Ну что, как вы оцениваете свой Июль? 👀

  1. Удовлетворительно 🥳45%
  2. Неудовлетворительно 😢55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 312,223 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сначала арбитраж | Потом терапия” (@arbitrazhterapiya), 559 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arbitrazhterapiya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.