Channel
@arab_board_ophthalmology
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+94 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003437296808 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arab_board_ophthalmology |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arab_board_ophthalmology |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 119 | +21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 98 | +44 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:43 | 54 | +25 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 29 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 25 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 44 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📱 طريقك الأقصر للتفوق في امتحانات البورد العربي! 🩺✨ لماذا تجعل من ABCExam مرجعك الأول والدائم في التحضير؟ لأننا جمعنا لك كل ما تحتاجه في مكان واحد لتتجنب التشتت بين المراجع: 🎯 أسئلة الدورات السابقة (Recalls): مجمعة من الامتحانات الفعلية لدراسة الأفكار الأكثر تكراراً. 🔗 ربط ذكي بالأسئلة العالمية: يربط التطبيق سؤال البورد العربي بأسئلة مشابِهة من بنوك عالمية معتمدة لترسيخ المفهوم من زوايا مختلفة. 📚 أدلة ومقالات مرجع…
Regarding traumatic optic neuropathy, which statement is correct?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
All of the following are techniques to reduce or correct for chromatic aberration EXCEPT:
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A feature NOT associated with exfoliation syndrome is:
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one of the following statements regarding Duane retraction syndrome is true?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In congenital nystagmus, which is the least appropriate statement?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following statements about congenital toxoplasmosis is FALSE?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
All of the following statements regarding the uveal tract are true EXCEPT:
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗓️ بدل التفكير في "من أين أبدأ اليوم؟".. اترك التخطيط لـ ABCExam تحوّل ميزة الجدول الزمني هدفك الكبير إلى خطة عمل يومية واضحة ومحددة: 🎯 حدّد تاريخ امتحان البورد. 📊 دع التطبيق يُقسّم المنهج والأسئلة تلقائياً على الأيام المتبقية حتى يوم الاختبار. انتقل من عشوائية المذاكرة إلى الخطة المنظمة بضغطة زر، وابدأ جلسة اليوم بخطة ذكية 👇 🎉 ابدأ رحلتك اليوم حمّل التطبيق، واستكشف الإصدار الجديد، وابدأ رحلتك نحو اجتياز البورد ا…
As regards posterior retinal breaks management, which is wrong?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Regarding the use of laser photocoagulation in treating retinoblastoma, which statement is incorrect?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which statement concerning juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is false?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arab_board_ophthalmology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Regarding traumatic optic neuropathy, which statement is correct?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
All of the following are techniques to reduce or correct for chromatic aberration EXCEPT:
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A feature NOT associated with exfoliation syndrome is:
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one of the following statements regarding Duane retraction syndrome is true?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In congenital nystagmus, which is the least appropriate statement?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following statements about congenital toxoplasmosis is FALSE?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arab_board_ophthalmology” (@arab_board_ophthalmology), 119 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arab_board_ophthalmology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.