Channel
@aquamarinamakeup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002153476036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aquamarinamakeup |
| Description | Решила создать канал в выходной, чтобы рассказывать о моей любимой работе |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aquamarinamakeup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 66 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 66 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
84 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 61.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 22.6% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 10.7% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 18 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В ЗЯ появились румяна от Simihaze в удобной упаковки и такой же формулы, как мой любимый бронзер 🫠 Фиолетовый уже раскупили, я грущу, что не успела, хотела взять два. Кстати в румянах двойках у всех кто покупал из моих знакомых - у всех отвалилась крышка 🤦🏻♀️ Радуюсь, что есть, надеюсь фиолетовый вернется в сток, а я куплю уже после отпуска.
❤1
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 💎💎💎💎💎 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🔣ПРЕМЬЕРА🔣 У нас вышел новый кавер! Будем очень рады вашей поддержке просмотрам и комментариям! Мы очень старались🤩
❤4
Чищу память телефона Наткнулась на фото из 2020 года. Сентябрь 2020. Я работаю визажистом в MAC Cosmetics и веду прямой эфир на аккаунте магазина в инсте. Снимали на фоне из Леонардо, на который скидывались всем коллективом, в нашей каморке 2на2 метра, где и ели. Помню, как я переживала, ведь это первый эфир, никакого монтажа. Было 5,5 лет назад, а столько всего произошло за это время! В руках, кстати, мой до сих п…
❤🔥8❤3
Тут такое, дело… 8 марта и наша Габриэла вышла 🔥
❤1
Уже успели посмотреть наше новое видео?🌹
❤🔥5❤1🔥1
Сегодня на съемке использовала жидкие румяна с акварельным эффектом. Они легче, чем кремовые, пытаюсь привыкнуть к этой формуле, но рука все равно тянется к любимым кремовым от MUFE или от Gev mua. Эффект от акварельных Hur невесомый, тушуются легко и легко наслаиваются, не супер пигментированы, но достаточно, чтобы быть заметными. На видео для стою на трех ступеньках, чтобы быть выше модели 😂👌🏼
❤5❤🔥2
Ко мне приехал заказ с сайта Style Korean. У меня теперь оооочень много продуктов skin1004 и одна эссенция от mixsoon (повелась на лайфхаки от корейских визажистов). Завтра/послезавтра покажу любимые продукты, которые и в кейсе и для себя 🫶🏻
❤4
Очень люблю снег в свой выходной и ненавижу, когда еду на работу! Всем доброе утро, визажистам и стилистам сил в руках и ногах 💪🏼
❤5❤🔥3👍1
🕺 aespa - armageddon : / no edit
❤8🔥5🥰3
Сегодня снимаем на парковке, я впервые надела линзы на себя, вполне комфортно, только фокус теряется иногда 😂
❤6
Video message, posted without a caption
❤9
Сегодня на съемке, наконец-то использовала свои корейские сокровища! Спасибо огромное корейцам за уникальные, круто работающие продукты! Это блески от бренда fwee, я взяла три блеска, которые меняют оттенок помады под ним. Обожаю такие штуки. И посмотрите как бликует на фото! Эффект как от жидкого стекла, но не такое липкое по текстуре и не течет. На модели использовала холодный, помада под ним была более теплая. О…
❤4🔥3❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @aquamarinamakeup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,126,351 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Будни визажиста” (@aquamarinamakeup), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aquamarinamakeup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.