Posted without readable text

Channel
aquamarin ✧
@aquamarin_artis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
298subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002363324576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aquamarin_artis |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aquamarin_artis |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 298 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:41 | 293 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 294 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 294 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 38.0%
- avg views ÷ 298 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 113
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 16.2%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (7 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 680 |
| Reactions total | 110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
394 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5771509402334925052 | 176 | 44.7% | |
| custom 5769429285248963394 | 149 | 37.8% | |
| custom 5771827393123586265 | 69 | 17.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 394reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 90
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 50
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aquamarin_artis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Теперь ваша енотка может двигаться, ееей! 🌟 Художник и Ригер этой прекрасной модельки - Воробух Так же у нее есть тикток и можно посмотреть там процесс создания модельки! Спасибо ей за эту красоту 🌟 Стримы с моделькой тут! (Напоминаю тем кто не успел подписаться на твич)
custom 577150940233492505210custom 57694292852489633943custom 57718273931235862651
Signed Rin
Доброго дня енотики, постараюсь сегодня запустить стрим 🧋
custom 577150940233492505213custom 57694292852489633945custom 57718273931235862652
Signed Rin
Прошу прощения что опять резко пропала со стримами, есть на то причины. 😣 Но зато у меня обновочка! Очень долго решалась обновлять ли себе граф планшет, в итоге все таки приобрела себе XP-Pen Artist 12 3d. Он конечно считается бюджеткой (15к), нооо с тем что я рисовала на bosto за 7к разница колоссальная. 🫨 А пока сижу привыкаю и рисую себе новый реф, так как решила сделать незначительные изменения в дизайне. В эт…
custom 576942928524896339412custom 57718273931235862654custom 57715094023349250523
Signed Rin
Спасибо @Enot_pod_prekyririem за чибика! Какая прелесть!🥰
custom 576942928524896339414custom 57715094023349250523custom 57718273931235862651
Signed Rin
Спасибо Мишуте за исполнение моей маленькой мечты! 🥰 Вернусь с отпуска и буду снова радовать вас своими стримами, а еще готовится множество обновлений и в планах ещё больше работы. Рассказывайте как ваши дела, как вы тут без меня? 👀
custom 576942928524896339413custom 57715094023349250525custom 57718273931235862652
Signed Rin
Спасибо большое за стрим!! 🫶 Очень приятно посидели, вас было сегодня так много! И на стриме собрали тир-лист по редфлагам, вдруг кому интересно 🫨 Так же сообщаю тем кто не знал, я ухожу в отпуск на неделю, не будет стримов, и практически не буду появляться в соц. сетях. Но зато потом нас ждём множество обновлений! 🤩 Поэтому не теряйте, хорошей вам недели, буду по вам скучать! ☺️
custom 577182739312358626510custom 57715094023349250526custom 57694292852489633943
Signed Rin
Кто же держал у себя горничную.... Так это был бармен! 😈
custom 577150940233492505221custom 57718273931235862657custom 57694292852489633946
Signed Rin
- Ой что же это? -Это доставка вашей персональной горничной! Как и обещала, артик в костюме горничной, а так же готовьтесь у меня в планах нарисовать ещё хорни контента 😏
custom 576942928524896339417custom 577150940233492505210custom 57718273931235862656
Signed Rin
А ещё у нас сегодня стукнула первая соточка фоловеров на твиче! Спасибо большое за то что сидите со мной и проводите время! 🥰
custom 576942928524896339416custom 57718273931235862655custom 57715094023349250524
Signed Rin
Нарисовала чибика для реактивки дискорда 😏
custom 577150940233492505223custom 577182739312358626512custom 576942928524896339410
Signed Rin
Нарисовала артик для Стики 😂 В благодарность за веру и поддержку!! ⭐️
custom 577150940233492505231custom 576942928524896339411custom 57718273931235862659
Signed Rin
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @aquamarin_artis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 397,079 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@xanthicgrapes · 752 postsadnormal, рисуешь?
@adnormallll · 1141 postBahchevnik(reisana8)
@bahchevnik · 961 postINK
@chernilnitza · 681 postДэха (ish)
@dehaish · 171 postèвелеттъ
@evilett · 3,0901 postGeneralBubz
@GBMaman · 1521 post| LazyArt |
@ILazyArtist · 1361 postktrixyy
@ktrixyy · 7681 postЛиара🔮
@Liara_6 · 221 post✧ líαv ✧
@liavilian · 1391 postlikamachka🍪| Жоский Рестик
@lickamachk · 501 postДэнки
@Lynn_Thibault · 411 postMARDY_YY
@mard_yyy · 1051 postМэсаи Итэ
@MesaiIte · 981 post| muribiri | art
@muribiriart · 221 postnqwesdayyy
@nqwesdayyy · 2061 post˖ ࣪ ⊹ 𝐍 𝐔 𝐋 𝐋 ⊹ ࣪ ˖
@Null_KaTL · 1281 postValandTina|Сладкие измерения🍭
@valandtina15 · 371 post!РЕСТ! Morevuo (warpole)
@warpole · 741 postwertigot.
@wertigot · 2,3761 postziksiis 16+🎅🏻🍊
@ziksiis · 7051 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aayr1i · 6261 postteabag_archive
@baggedteaBag · 1,5831 postCr.art😈
@creta_art · 3451 post· •. ✶˚ .˚ || Cult ||
@CULT_OF_darkNIKSTI · 4581 post99
@D9999EN · 13,8541 postèвелеттъ
@evilett · 3,0901 postФруктовая наливка
@frynaliv · 2811 post🌸Hotarushka 🌸
@hotarushka_art · 9161 postАрхив,Киликато суету наводит🐖
@kilikamimimu · 8081 postkamītis .
@KKK7kami · 1501 post🧪 Klar Jezebeth 🧪
@klar_jezebeth · 3061 postKoyasu
@koyasu_art · 1,2061 postKrimarta
@krimartaaa · 1,9461 postktrixyy
@ktrixyy · 7681 post✧ Nefis | Нефис ✧
@Lady_Nefis · 4561 postлуиз безнадёга
@luizisburiedhere · 7031 postMakosh senpai
@makosh_senpai · 3311 postꕥ Мама Midva ꕥ
@midvaart · 2,7441 postmossshhhka
@moshkart · 1,7041 postnanakoi_art
@nanakoi_art · 9461 postnyas1men
@nyasimen · 3,9211 postPhanthema
@phanthema · 1,7971 postpokiuka
@pokiuka · 1,0271 post𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑦𝑎
@posssic · 1,4491 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@aquamarin_artis named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“aquamarin ✧” (@aquamarin_artis), 298 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aquamarin_artis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.