🚨 LIMITED-TIME AQUAGPT MEGA SALE — 12 HOURS ONLY 🚨 🇺🇸 AquaGPT — The Most Powerful Unrestricted AI No filters. No limits. No boundaries. • Advanced code generation • Security research assistance • Custom AI agents • Unrestricted content creation • Fast, powerful, and always available 💎 Lifetime Access — Only $2,000 ⏰ This promotion is available for 12 hours only 🌐 Free Trial: aquagpt.dev ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇷🇺 Aqua…

Channel
AquaGPT
@aquagpt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
95subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003718515675 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aquagpt |
| Description | The most powerful unrestricted AI. No filters, no limits, no boundaries. Support @uncaught |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aquagpt |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 95 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 95 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 77.8%
- avg views ÷ 95 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 73.9
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,183 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 12
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 48s
- Average length
- 48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
AquaGPT pinned «10 AQUAGPT TRIAL KEY 😀 AQUA-DE6F8B990607 AQUA-EADB991086C4 AQUA-599B43E475FE AQUA-56C8DE786583 AQUA-CDA70EB6DD51 AQUA-637CA0345706 AQUA-972CD2F1107E AQUA-5CE32B996FA4 AQUA-609D7A6A93AB AQUA-9D3E5B1B9098»
10 AQUAGPT TRIAL KEY 😀 AQUA-DE6F8B990607 AQUA-EADB991086C4 AQUA-599B43E475FE AQUA-56C8DE786583 AQUA-CDA70EB6DD51 AQUA-637CA0345706 AQUA-972CD2F1107E AQUA-5CE32B996FA4 AQUA-609D7A6A93AB AQUA-9D3E5B1B9098
Many fools are mad because i forked their source code (Overlord) Improved it & made it private and then offering crypting services on top of it 😂 Access is 100% Free 🍟 Thanks you for the free promotion BTW 🇱🇷 DM @uncaught for FUD Rat Services
Keep in mind - AquaRAT 100% free to use, contact support to get your key. You pay only for the Crypting Services Support @uncaught
🇺🇸 Pricelist Native application support, input .bin file -> output .exe file One-time crypt for stealers: — Private 150$ 💵 (0/26) Polymorphic stub (unique generation), suitable for any traffic. Possible weight up to 1 mb, probably increase of detects. — PrivatePlus 650$ 💰 (0/26) Suitable for any task, both point and large-scale traffic. Increased quality of tapping - dynamic injector. Possible weight up to 1 mb, …
Keep in mind that's a lifetime access, no AI provider offer that kind of services without limitation.
I'll keep 1 or 2 lifetime key for only 1000$ until tomorrow. Then price goes back to 2000$ 🔥
🇺🇸 The extension is currently being updated and will be back soon. The extension is still operational, but timeouts, temporary errors, or occasional instability may occur while the update is being deployed. Thank you for your patience and understanding! ❤️ ⸻ 🇷🇺 Расширение сейчас обновляется и скоро снова будет доступно. Расширение всё ещё работает, однако во время обновления возможны тайм-ауты, временные ошибки …
Sticker, posted without a caption
AquaGPT pinned «10 AQUAGPT TRIAL KEY 😀 AQUA-DE6F8B990607 AQUA-EADB991086C4 AQUA-599B43E475FE AQUA-56C8DE786583 AQUA-CDA70EB6DD51 AQUA-637CA0345706 AQUA-972CD2F1107E AQUA-5CE32B996FA4 AQUA-609D7A6A93AB AQUA-9D3E5B1B9098»
10 AQUAGPT TRIAL KEY 😀 AQUA-DE6F8B990607 AQUA-EADB991086C4 AQUA-599B43E475FE AQUA-56C8DE786583 AQUA-CDA70EB6DD51 AQUA-637CA0345706 AQUA-972CD2F1107E AQUA-5CE32B996FA4 AQUA-609D7A6A93AB AQUA-9D3E5B1B9098
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aquagpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should we make a special channel dedicated to AquaRAT ?🥇
- Yes21%
- No36%
- Nigger64%
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 267,267 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AquaGPT” (@aquagpt), 95 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aquagpt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.