Channel
@aqq584520
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
490subscribers
+52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003570368116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aqq584520 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aqq584520 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 490 | +42 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 448 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 438 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (17 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,418 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#出击模板 【出击报告】 验证留名：猛攻快枪手 老师昵称：圈圈 电报号: @qq584520zy 出击时间：8.6 地市坐标：#深圳 # 上课花费：1700pp 出击体验：课室环境安全干净，真人跟照片基本没啥大差别，很漂亮，妹子性格随和，整体体验不错，值得推荐 优点缺点：嫩妹 颜值高 打分：大众车（玩具车不推荐 自行车一般 摩托车还行 大众车推荐 五菱神车强力推荐） 五陵修车大队报告: https://t.me/wulingshenche 五陵修车大队: https://t.me/szwl7 报告发送: @Wulingmei_bot（提交报告需要提供相关资料，如聊天记录，付款记录等）
Sticker, posted without a caption
😝
❤2
开课🥰
🎉 抽奖活动： 南山 圈圈 @qq584520zy 抽奖活动 📝 说明： 深圳最全查询群，收录了深圳地区近乎完整的教师信息，查询功能强大，能够全面整合正面评价、负面反馈及欺诈行为警示。📚🔍https://t.me/SzWLCha 中奖联系老师: @qq584520zy 兑换奖品七天内有效（优惠券需写报告） 🎁 奖品： - p100 优惠券 x 3 - pp300 优惠券 x 3 - p 半价优惠券 x 1 ⏰ 开奖时间(北京时间): 2026年8月7日 18:00:00 ⏳ 距离开奖还有 73 小时 34 分 📋 参与条件： 深圳公开频道收录集 深圳五陵修车大队 深圳五陵查询群 圈圈的小窝
中奖的哥哥 可以来找我对奖了
明天开课哥哥们🥰
还在红休 开课了会提前通知各位哥哥😘
休假了哥哥们🥰
【萝莉报告】:[https://t.me/shenzhenluolidao] 【所在位置】: 宝安 【老师艺名】: 圈圈 【联系方式】:@qq584520zy 【验证留名】: joker 【验证时间】:7.18 【上课价位】: 1000 【颜值身材】: 颜值顶，身材一绝，熊软软的，逼热热的 【服务内容】: 课表都有 【服务态度】: 态度好，服务好，爽，值得一试 【优点缺点】: 小巧可爱俏皮滑头的小妹妹 【推荐程度】: 强烈推荐 【体验细节】: 二刷了，上次中奖时间有限，没体验够，这次一开课就又立马约上了，再奖励一把二弟。还是一流的体验，娇小的身躯里蕴含着大大的能量，洗澡就给二弟整的意气风发了，摸摸大胸，刚好够一手，软软的，摸摸比比，肥肥的，提枪上阵，体验不亦乐乎，一不小心就123被秒了，爽是爽了，笑就笑吧。最后，圈圈圆圆圈圈，#？！！？#！#再见，我们两不相欠。好评，下次还来 ✍️报告提交点击[ @xiaobao2bot ] 注…
❤3
❤️ #宝安 #圈圈 【深圳学院】: @sz520 @sz1314 【出击日期】: 7月18日 【报告来源】: #yangzhaohaoliang 【体验细节】：⬇️ 本人比照片漂亮 可爱 嫩妹 大胸 身材非常好 很小一只 服务方面 课表都有 口活好 很有耐心 配合度高！ 【总结概括】：⬇️ 非常不错 推荐给位来试试 【联系老师】：@qq584520zy👆 投稿需要提交记录 隐私可打马赛克 萝卜白菜各有所爱 建议多观察对比
🈳 可约
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @aqq584520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,083,962 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@aqq584520 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“圈圈的小窝” (@aqq584520), 490 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aqq584520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.