Исторические провинции Месхетии
❤🔥7❤5💯2🔥2

Channel
@apsuatsaar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
194subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002381619141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @apsuatsaar |
| Description | Проект по сбору, анализу и распространению культурно-исторических материалов об абхазском и «грузинских» народах. Исследовать страницы общего прошлого, сохранить и представить миру богатство нашей правдивой истории. Летописец – @YhVh_q |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/apsuatsaar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 194 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 194 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,114 |
| Reactions total | 182 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
182 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 66 | 36.3% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 21.4% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 13.7% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 5.49% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 4.95% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 4.40% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 4.40% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 4.40% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.75% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.549% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.549% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @apsuatsaar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Исторические провинции Месхетии
❤🔥7❤5💯2🔥2
Абазины – идеал рыцарства для аристократичных кабардинских рыцарей Золотой стандарт Кавказа: кабардинцы Спроси любого на Кавказе: кто считается эталоном аристократизма, изысканных манер и рыцарского поведения? Ответ будет единодушным — кабардинцы. Веками эпитет «кабардинский» был синонимом аристократической изысканности и комильфотности. Адыгский термин «уэрк хаблэ» — дворянский, рыцарский этикет — звучал как высша…
❤5❤🔥5🔥4🤔1😁1
Одна из высших похвал в Грузии: «აფხაზურად აღზრდილი!», т.е. «ты воспитан как абхаз!» «Абхазы – французы Кавказа»: так их величают в Грузии Представьте: вы в Грузии, за большим столом. Кто-то произносит тост, и вдруг сосед кивает на вас и с уважением роняет: «Ах, он воспитан, как абхаз». Это не просто комплимент. Это одна из «высших похвал», которую можно было услышать в Грузии. В конце XIX века писатель Евгений Мар…
❤10⚡7❤🔥7🔥3🤔1
⛰ Тайна царя Георгия: за что правитель Абхазии получил имя «Агхцепский»? В 923 году на историческую арену Кавказа выходит новый правитель - на абхазский престол восходит царствующий особа по имени Георгий. Его фигура четко зафиксирована в уникальном летописном памятнике «Список царей абхазов», где среди правителей, начиная с полулегендарного Аноса, он занимает четырнадцатое место: «четырнадцатым царил брат их Георг…
❤🔥4👍4❤2🔥1
Список источников: 1. Гулиа Д. История Абхазии. Т. 1. — Тифлис, 1925. 2. Джавахишвили И. А. История грузинского народа. Кн. 1. — Тбилиси, 1913. 3. Gamqreliże G. Researches in Iberia-colchology: history and archaeology of ancient Georgia. — Tbilisi, 2012. Стр. 43. 4. Аполлоний Родосский. Аргонавтика. Книга 2, 398–402. 5. Прокопий Кесарийский. Война с готами. Книга 4, раздел 14. 6. Spruner von Merz K., Menke Th. Albani…
❤🔥5🔥2💯1
Апсилы: исконные колхидцы и соавторы Колхидской культуры Апсилы были неотъемлемой частью колхидского мира с самого начала, и их вклад в создание Колхидской культуры столь же весом. Археолог О. М. Джапаридзе указывал, что абхазские племена населяли территорию Колхиды в глубочайшей древности. Древние авторы указывали , что в Колхиде существовало два царства, одно из которых было абхазского происхождения, со столицей в …
❤🔥5👍2🔥1
Мегрело-лазы: прямые наследники колхов Главный критерий преемственности — язык. Колхидский (занский) язык жив до сих пор: на нём говорят мегрелы и лазы. Именно их античные авторы фиксируют на землях исторической Колхиды. Современная этнография это подтверждает. В Мегрелии по сей день отмечают колхидский Новый год — Каланду (от лат. Calendae), с ритуальной «ёлочкой» чичилаки (мегр. кучуч) и обрядом «счастливой ноги» …
❤🔥5⚡2🔥2
КОЛХИ: апсилы и мегрело-лазы — исконные колхидцы и прямые наследники Колхиды (кратко) Колхида — одна из древнейших цивилизаций Кавказа. Данные языка, археологии, античных источников и этнографии однозначно указывают: прямыми потомками колхов и создателями Колхидской культуры являются два исконных народа региона — мегрело-лазские племена и древнеабхазское племя апсилов. Мегрело-лазы https://t.me/apsuatsaar/1362 Апсилы…
❤🔥2💯2😁2⚡1👍1🔥1
Неполный список уничтоженных абазинских (Ашәуаа, Ашьҳарыуаа) и абхазских (Асаӡуаа, Мдамҩа) аулов во время Русско-Кавказской войны https://telegra.ph/Nepolnyj-spisok-unichtozhennyh-abazinskih-i-sadzskih-aulov-vo-vremya-Russko-Kavkazskoj-vojny-08-02
💔7❤2✍1❤🔥1🤔1😁1
Термин «Абаза» (ср. с Абешла) по своему генезису уходит в глубочайшую древность. Это научно было обосновано ещё в 40 годах нашего столетия. Например, один из исследователей абазинского языка А. Н. Генко по этому поводу писал следующее: «Термин абаза очень древнего происхождения и имеет собирательное значение, объединившиеся общностью языка и культуры …». Абазины (Абазаа), Абхазы (Аҧсуаа) и Убыхи (Ҭәахыаа) есть Абаза/…
❤🔥8❤3🔥3🤔2👀1💔1😁1
«Грязная правда»: профессор Мераб Чухуа про грузино-абхазский конфликт, о покаянии и диалоге Профессор Мераб Чухуа в начале конфликта открыто выступил против войны и лично перекрывал дороги, пытаясь остановить военную технику и предотвратить кровопролитие между грузинами и абхазами. Он называет ту войну провокационной и подчёркивает, что она нанесла колоссальный ущерб обоим народам и обеим государственностям. По его …
❤6❤🔥6🙏2
Дюбуа-де-Монпере: Самурзакано должен принадлежать Абхазии, т.к. самурзаканцы – абхазы Нет сомнения в том, что округ этот (Самурзакано), спорный между владетелями Мингрелии и Абхазии, должен принадлежать Абхазии, так как его жители Абхазского племени и ничего общего не имеют с Мингрельским. Но этот округ не раз переходил из рук в руки в продолжение вековой вражды соседей. - АБХАЗИЯ и в ней НОВО-АФОНСКИЙ СИМОНО-КАНАНИТ…
💯4❤🔥3🔥2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @apsuatsaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 445,753 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аҧсуаа | ქართველები | მარგალ-ლაზეფე | შუ̂ანა̈რ” (@apsuatsaar), 194 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apsuatsaar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.