Channel
@apozilol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
301subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001210045844 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @apozilol |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/apozilol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 301 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 301 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (18 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 815 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
147 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 59 | 40.1% | |
| custom 5242387427380703847 | 36 | 24.5% | |
| custom 5267000184147033621 | 34 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5262969623627704708 | 14 | 9.52% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 2.72% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @apozilol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟 🥝🥝🥝 🌟 Вот и готовы все ючики, спасибо что дождались Я вот с отпуска приехала ещё насчет этого что ни будь наскетчу 😁 | #арт #заказ
❤🔥5custom 52423874273807038472custom 52670001841470336211
🅰️🅰️: селфхарм картинка с автором Долго дума выкладывать или нет. Давно не рисовала на компе и вот чибикс, хотела просто как то эмоции выплеснуть на рисунок вот и эээ, без вопрос короче пон? спс Забрала планшет буду теперь делать заказы жестка!!!! | #арт
❤🔥11custom 52629696236277047082custom 52670001841470336212
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Летние ючики по приколу 🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫 Я думаю что возьмет не сильно много кто так что без слотов, до стоп слова 🐈🐈🐈🐈 🌟 будет легкий фон и полноценный чиби покрас 🌟 за доплату 100р могу вместо бтд дуриков нарисовать кого угодно 🌟ЗАКРЫТО ||п.с для текущего заказчика, я про вас не забыла, просто пока не вернулся себе плашнео не могу его начать 🌟 Связаться - @Poziiiii
❤🔥10custom 52423874273807038474custom 52670001841470336213
(Ладно лучше перезалю лол) ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ Ох ребята я так ⭐️⭐️ соскучилась ⭐️⭐️ Я щас живу от сна до работы и обратно, так что рисовать удаётся не так часто 😒 Хочу пилить вам полноценки и всё такое.. Вот это типо редрав картинки с 2022 но с более... Продуманной идеей, перс из ролки, скоро в отпуск надеюсь получиться там вас порадовать 😇| #арт
❤🔥9custom 52670001841470336216custom 52423874273807038474custom 52629696236277047083
Картинки для артфайт
❤🔥5custom 52423874273807038473custom 52629696236277047082😍1
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Ребята привет, потеряли? Я последнее время не рисовала вообще только работа работа, вот щас ультанула. Второй картинке год уже но раз тема аленстейдж тоже добавлю лол. Хочу рисовать побольше.. | #арт #скетч #традиш
custom 526700018414703362112❤🔥7custom 52629696236277047085custom 52423874273807038473
🤩🤩🤩🤩 Мне 21 Ура у меня день рождения, представьте только я на этом канале уже 3ий год день рождения провожу, спасибо всем что вы всё ещё со мной Хороший подарок будет если репостните постик этот. Вообще долг думала что сюла добавить, из за скачков стиля я уже и не знаю что мне сюда вставлять ахаха... 🌟
custom 524238742738070384720❤🔥12custom 526700018414703362110😍3custom 52629696236277047082
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @apozilol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 192,550 of 1,176,613entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“apozi” (@apozilol), 301 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apozilol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.