Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for જ⁀➴𝐀 𝐏𝐢𝐞𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐞✨️

Channel

જ⁀➴𝐀 𝐏𝐢𝐞𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐞✨️

@apieceofme_diary

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

679subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002293552751
TypeChannel
Username@apieceofme_diary
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/apieceofme_diary

Previous handles

@apieceofme_diary was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@LtlDiary
held 8 August 20268 August 2026

Growth

666689677.58 August 2026 — 669 subscribers9 August 2026 — 666 subscribers13 August 2026 — 689 subscribers14 August 2026 — 679 subscribers6798 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 5 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 663–692 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:58679-10
13 Aug 2026, 06:46689+23
9 Aug 2026, 04:12666-3
8 Aug 2026, 14:46669first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.7%
avg views ÷ 679 subscribers
Avg views / post
263
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held28 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total7,361
Reactions total897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

897 reactions across 26 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.80% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5438448518324841828707.80%
custom 5242290120601656203535.91%
custom 5404693099035266920535.91%
custom 5936188236694034525505.57%
custom 5406605647972157080465.13%
custom 5039874939075693222434.79%
custom 5456290942048814325384.24%
custom 5240393089381586520343.79%
custom 5935851451128486570343.79%
custom 5240112606542321419333.68%
custom 5087214957670433559323.57%
custom 5262671999573977569303.34%
custom 5413331429318734829303.34%
custom 5244931894855891383293.23%
custom 5407043519887986568293.23%
custom 5440467513731211390273.01%
custom 5237993138966007447252.79%
custom 5239982245694953233242.68%
custom 5087250786287616883232.56%
custom 5244498150403634735232.56%
21 further kinds17119.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 897reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @apieceofme_diary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC103 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026

𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑦 𝑔𝑖𝑟𝑙𝑠 𝒉𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑜.🎀

custom 49450194481771981545custom 52427521731833548865custom 54203003144042134675

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

12 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC232 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

شاید تو دنیای موازی گل فروش باشم🤍✨️

custom 54565556623581051916custom 49453493532051383755custom 54069046807751741324

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

11 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC246 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

"ولی رویای من ارزش داره تا ابد براش بجنگم💕🫠"

custom 542934933375553724614custom 51029425223179970744custom 53323231964504115584

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

10 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC253 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026

من هنوز مهربونم؛ فقط دیگه به هرکسی اجازه‌ی نزدیک شدن نمی‌دم.

custom 540469309903526692025

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

10 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC249 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

شب بخیر به اونایی که امروز رو هم somehow پشت سر گذاشتن.🤍

custom 508725078628761688323

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

10 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC245 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

امروز حالتون شبیه کدومه؟

  1. 🤍 آروم23%
  2. 🫠 خسته36%
  3. ✨ سرحال14%
  4. 🫧 بی‌حوصله50%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 593585145112848657034

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

9 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC259 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026

زن‌ها قدرتمندترین سلاح‌اند نه به‌خاطر آنچه در دست دارند بلکه به‌خاطر ذهنی که هیچ‌کس نمی‌تواند بخواند و تصمیمی که هیچ‌کس نمی‌تواند پیش‌بینی کند.

custom 543844851832484182824custom 50895718896935909617custom 59361882366940345256

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

8 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC268 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026

لطفاً آدم امنی باشین! برای عشق، برای رفاقت، برای زندگی ادما به آدما حس امنیت بدین؛ مراقب تصوری که ازتون دارن باشید؛ مراقب اعتبارتون توی قلب و ذهن آدما باشید. بذر بدبینی رو تو دل آدما نکارید، خوب باشید؛ خوب بودن و موندن سخته، قلب آدما مهم ترین داراییه که دارن پس مراقب قلب آدما باشید. کاری نکنید آرامش روح کسی تو این دنیا توسط شما سلب بشه. شما میون این همه تاریکی نور زندگی آدما باشید..

custom 524011260654232141933

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

8 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rezayat_sitePhoto

#رضایت_خریدبوست برای بار دوم اعتماد شما♥️

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

8 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC78 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/dAneSju_Tch_me #حمایتی❤️

custom 51139194923589320314custom 50868569807362470333

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

7 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC288 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026

هر چیزی، که اذیتت می کنه، داره صبر کردن رو بهت یاد میده؛ هر کسی که ترکت میکنه داره ایستادن رو پای خودت رو، بهت یاد میده؛ چیزی که عصبانیت می‌کنه داره بخشش رو بهت یاد میده، هیچ چیز بدون نتیجه نمی‌مونه.

custom 540704351988798656829custom 54069046807751741328custom 49453067686043990244

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

6 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC292 views44 reactionsread 13 August 2026

من تو زندگیم هر کار کردم با تمام قلبم بوده؛ خصوصا وقتی با کسی رفاقت کردم. هیچوقت حساب و کتاب نکردم و دنبال منفعت خودم نبودم.بلد هم نیستم آدم هارو دور بزنم.اونایی که بی ریایی منو نقطه ضعفم دونستن منو باختن. و هیچوقت قرار نیست دوباره منو داشته باشن و این بزرگترین تنبیه خواهد بود...

custom 523799313896600744725custom 523801233746980307511custom 52422901206016562038

Signed 𝐀𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐚

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @apieceofme_diary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

امروز حالتون شبیه کدومه؟

  1. 🤍 آروم23%
  2. 🫠 خسته36%
  3. ✨ سرحال14%
  4. 🫧 بی‌حوصله50%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

اگر فقط یکی رو می‌تونستی انتخاب کنی کدومو برمی‌داشتی؟

  1. بستنی57%
  2. شیرکاکائو62%
  3. نوتلا14%
  4. پشمک10%

The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 631,667 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“જ⁀➴𝐀 𝐏𝐢𝐞𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐞✨️” (@apieceofme_diary), 679 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apieceofme_diary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.