Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

API AURA

@api_aura

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

350subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002319980129
TypeChannel
Username@api_aura
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/api_aura

Growth

343350346.56 August 2026 — 343 subscribers6 August 2026 — 343 subscribers14 August 2026 — 350 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 342–351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:23350+7
6 Aug 2026, 22:46343no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:39343first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 350 subscribers
Avg views / post
102
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (10 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total711
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

162 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5332.7%
👍3823.5%
🔥2616.0%
custom 530525992891348474774.32%
custom 628036737798924333563.70%
custom 627845205020849446153.09%
👏53.09%
😍53.09%
🙏53.09%
🥰53.09%
💯31.85%
custom 530559256124565959621.23%
custom 628076125226009014310.617%
🆒10.617%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC39 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✏️ Маточное молочко и мышцы: почему этим заинтересовались учёные? Когда говорят о мышцах, большинство представляет спортзал 🏋️‍♂️. Но сегодня врачи всё чаще говорят совсем о другом. После 40–45 лет человек начинает постепенно терять мышечную массу ⏳. После 60 лет этот процесс может значительно ускоряться. Именно поэтому саркопению сегодня называют одной из ключевых проблем медицины здорового долголетия. Вопрос уж

🔥5👍4custom 62803673779892433354custom 53052599289134847471custom 53055925612456595961custom 62784520502084944611

3 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC53 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Почему в Японии маточное молочко изучают уже более 60 лет, а в Европе оно остаётся нишевым продуктом? Маточное молочко начали активно исследовать в Японии ещё в 1960-х годах. Именно тогда в стране развивались технологии его производства, появлялись первые специализированные компании и проводились клинические наблюдения 📈. Японские источники относят пик ранних клинических исследований маточного молочка именно к этому

😍5custom 53052599289134847475custom 62784520502084944614👍3custom 62803673779892433351custom 62807612522600901431

30 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC89 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

По вашим просьбам: встречайте Vigory в новом формате! 🔥 Мы всегда внимательно читаем ваши сообщения и отзывы и знаем, как вы ждали этот релиз! Вы просили сделать API VIGORY доступным в упаковке с меньшим количеством таблеток — и мы это сделали! Мы рады сообщить, что теперь API VIGORY выпускается в двух форматах — 30 и 60 таблеток 💊 🟣30 таблеток — удобный вариант для первого знакомства с продуктом. 🟣60 таблеток —

🔥86🙏5custom 53052599289134847471custom 53055925612456595961custom 62803673779892433351

27 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC147 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🍊 Почему витамин С в апельсине — не совсем то же самое, что витамин С в таблетке? Мы привыкли оценивать продукты и добавки по количеству отдельных веществ: 🔵 сколько витаминов; 🔵 сколько минералов; 🔵 сколько аминокислот; 🔵 какая дозировка указана на этикетке. Но пища — это не просто список ингредиентов 📝 Внутри цельного продукта витамины, минералы, ферменты, аминокислоты, органические кислоты, флавоноиды и полифе

7👍4🔥2🥰1

24 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC130 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«В мёде много сахаров» — правда ✅ «Значит, мёд ничем не отличается от белого сахара» — уже слишком упрощённый вывод ❌ Организм реагирует не на название продукта и не на одну строку в таблице состава. Важны количество, сочетание компонентов, контекст приёма и индивидуальная реакция ⚖️. В карусели разбираемся, что в популярном утверждении о мёде верно, а где начинаются нюансы 🔜 💬 Как вы считаете: мёд — отдельный пол

8👍4🥰4🆒1

21 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC130 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Почему иногда даже полноценный сон не возвращает энергию?🔋 Мы привыкли думать, что усталость — это просто нехватка отдыха. Но современные исследования показывают: иногда проблема начинается гораздо глубже — внутри самих клеток 🧬 Митохондрии постоянно оценивают своё состояние ⛈ Если нагрузка становится слишком высокой, клетка запускает целую программу защиты — так называемый митохондриальный стресс-ответ 🛡 Это не

10👍5🔥4

17 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTC123 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐝 Заметки из улья Кажется, что стресс возникает только во время больших проблем. Но для мозга нет большой разницы между дедлайном, опозданием, неприятным сообщением или важным выступлением. Каждый такой момент — это сигнал: «Будь готов. Возможна опасность.» И если подобных сигналов десятки каждый день, организм постепенно начинает жить в режиме постоянной мобилизации. Именно поэтому многие чувствуют усталость даж

7👍4💯3

15 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC107 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🔋 Куда уходит ваша энергия? Вся правда об «истощенных надпочечниках» от врача уролога- андролога высшей категории, врач интегративной медицины, Д-доктор. Никифорова Дениса Юрьевича. В современном мире синдром хронической усталости стал почти нормой 🥱. Мы привыкли жить на износ, подгоняя себя стимуляторами ☕️. Но наш организм — не вечный двигатель, и главный удар при затяжном стрессе принимают на себя надпочечники.

8🔥6👍5

10 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC132 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐝 Почему природа не оставляет в улье двух королев? На первый взгляд это кажется жестоким. Но для пчелиной семьи это вопрос выживания. Если в одном улье одновременно останутся две матки, семья почти неизбежно разделится. Часть пчёл уйдёт с одной королевой искать новый дом, а оставшиеся продолжат жить в старом улье. Именно поэтому природа сформировала механизм, при котором в семье обычно остаётся только одна матка.

👍97👏5🔥1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @api_aura. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 359,174 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“API AURA” (@api_aura), 350 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/api_aura.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.