Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

апейрофобия

@apeirophobia8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001817119276
TypeChannel
Username@apeirophobia8
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/apeirophobia8

Growth

7410 Aug 2026, 17:46 — 74 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:54 — 74 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 17:4611 Aug 2026, 11:54
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 11:5474no change
10 Aug 2026, 17:4674first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 2 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5267511714751977264617.1%
custom 5275999978878148985617.1%
custom 5334920552152841879617.1%
custom 5361995901432783789617.1%
custom 5194947271623451295514.3%
custom 5215674165318657589514.3%
custom 526948098732197496212.86%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 May 2026, 01:48 UTC167 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

раздача галереи

custom 53619959014327837892custom 52156741653186575891custom 52759999788781489851custom 53349205521528418791

Signed still believe

13 May 2026, 01:48 UTC158 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52759999788781489852custom 51949472716234512951custom 53349205521528418791

Signed still believe

10 May 2026, 04:22 UTC126 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed детх

10 May 2026, 04:21 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52759999788781489852custom 53349205521528418791custom 53619959014327837891

Signed still believe

4 May 2026, 21:45 UTC133 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52675117147519772642custom 52156741653186575891custom 53619959014327837891

Signed still believe

4 May 2026, 12:12 UTC115 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

мне нет 13!!!!!!!!

custom 52156741653186575891custom 52675117147519772641custom 52694809873219749621

Signed детх

4 May 2026, 12:08 UTC145 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

начало цп

custom 52156741653186575891custom 52675117147519772641custom 53349205521528418791

Signed детх

4 May 2026, 12:07 UTC143 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

успела заскринить

custom 51949472716234512951custom 52759999788781489851custom 53619959014327837891

Signed still believe

4 May 2026, 03:34 UTC96 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

привет

custom 52675117147519772642custom 52156741653186575891custom 53349205521528418791

Signed still believe

2 May 2026, 23:00 UTC88 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51949472716234512953custom 53349205521528418791custom 53619959014327837891

Signed still believe

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @apeirophobia8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,142,342 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“апейрофобия” (@apeirophobia8), 74 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apeirophobia8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.