Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Airdrop

Channel

Airdrop

@apeairdropp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,619subscribers

-4,454 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002048835461
TypeChannel
Username@apeairdropp
Created11 May 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/apeairdropp

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

30,61935,07332,84628 August 2026 — 35,073 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,070 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,978 subscribers30 August 2026 — 34,893 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,792 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,725 subscribers3 September 2026 — 34,624 subscribers5 September 2026 — 34,478 subscribers8 September 2026 — 34,219 subscribers11 September 2026 — 34,062 subscribers13 September 2026 — 33,922 subscribers14 September 2026 — 33,798 subscribers16 September 2026 — 33,700 subscribers19 September 2026 — 33,570 subscribers25 September 2026 — 33,214 subscribers4 October 2026 — 32,689 subscribers8 October 2026 — 32,449 subscribers13 October 2026 — 32,065 subscribers14 October 2026 — 31,913 subscribers15 October 2026 — 31,817 subscribers16 October 2026 — 31,746 subscribers17 October 2026 — 31,669 subscribers18 October 2026 — 31,586 subscribers19 October 2026 — 31,510 subscribers20 October 2026 — 31,423 subscribers22 October 2026 — 31,333 subscribers23 October 2026 — 31,263 subscribers24 October 2026 — 31,217 subscribers25 October 2026 — 31,149 subscribers26 October 2026 — 31,131 subscribers27 October 2026 — 31,078 subscribers28 October 2026 — 31,028 subscribers29 October 2026 — 30,959 subscribers30 October 2026 — 30,909 subscribers31 October 2026 — 30,830 subscribers1 November 2026 — 30,770 subscribers2 November 2026 — 30,710 subscribers3 November 2026 — 30,661 subscribers3 November 2026 — 30,619 subscribers28 August 20263 November 2026
39 measurements spanning 67 days, net -4,454. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,951–35,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 23:4530,619-42
3 Nov 2026, 02:2530,661-49
2 Nov 2026, 05:2830,710-60
1 Nov 2026, 01:5830,770-60
31 Oct 2026, 03:3830,830-79
30 Oct 2026, 01:4730,909-50
29 Oct 2026, 02:4630,959-69
28 Oct 2026, 02:2831,028-50
27 Oct 2026, 05:3631,078-53
26 Oct 2026, 07:3631,131-18
25 Oct 2026, 06:3531,149-68
24 Oct 2026, 03:2831,217-46
23 Oct 2026, 04:4831,263-70
22 Oct 2026, 01:1131,333-90
20 Oct 2026, 18:4031,423-87
19 Oct 2026, 16:3031,510-76
18 Oct 2026, 15:4531,586-83
17 Oct 2026, 12:0931,669-77
16 Oct 2026, 10:4531,746-71
15 Oct 2026, 13:3031,817first reading

Engagement

288 posts held, back to 11 May 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.013%
avg views ÷ 30,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
4.0
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
111
of 288 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 57 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held288 (11 May 2024 – 3 November 2026)
Views total230
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 10:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1392.9%
🔥17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 288 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 288 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2024 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2026, 10:17 UTCviews —

Airdrop pinned «https://t.me/ThunderWavesBot/App?startapp=ref_5Q0TRYN5 https://t.me/PAlDZ_BOT/start?startapp=PZ2QTR9J89U1F https://t.me/surf_earn_bot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/MBuxBot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/fomopok_bot?startapp=r181ce4c742c5…»

2 Nov 2026, 09:23 UTC5 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @CipherCryptoTrader

https://t.me/ThunderWavesBot/App?startapp=ref_5Q0TRYN5 https://t.me/PAlDZ_BOT/start?startapp=PZ2QTR9J89U1F https://t.me/surf_earn_bot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/MBuxBot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/fomopok_bot?startapp=r181ce4c742c5 https://t.me/CryptoBotsDevilishGoodBot/app?startapp=ref_43203E83 https://t.me/GmailFarmerBot?start=2104251263

1 Nov 2026, 21:22 UTC3 viewsread 1 November 2026
Forwarded from @CipherCryptoTraderPhoto

https://t.me/ThunderWavesBot/App?startapp=ref_5Q0TRYN5 https://t.me/PAlDZ_BOT/start?startapp=PZ2QTR9J89U1F https://t.me/surf_earn_bot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/MBuxBot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/fomopok_bot?startapp=r181ce4c742c5 https://t.me/CryptoBotsDevilishGoodBot/app?startapp=ref_43203E83 https://t.me/GmailFarmerBot?start=2104251263

1 Nov 2026, 09:21 UTC2 viewsread 1 November 2026
Forwarded from @CipherCryptoTraderPhoto

https://t.me/ThunderWavesBot/App?startapp=ref_5Q0TRYN5 https://t.me/PAlDZ_BOT/start?startapp=PZ2QTR9J89U1F https://t.me/surf_earn_bot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/MBuxBot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/fomopok_bot?startapp=r181ce4c742c5 https://t.me/CryptoBotsDevilishGoodBot/app?startapp=ref_43203E83 https://t.me/GmailFarmerBot?start=2104251263

31 Oct 2026, 21:21 UTC5 viewsread 31 October 2026
Forwarded from @CipherCryptoTraderPhoto

https://t.me/ThunderWavesBot/App?startapp=ref_5Q0TRYN5 https://t.me/PAlDZ_BOT/start?startapp=PZ2QTR9J89U1F https://t.me/surf_earn_bot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/MBuxBot/app?startapp=r_1906858549 https://t.me/fomopok_bot?startapp=r181ce4c742c5 https://t.me/CryptoBotsDevilishGoodBot/app?startapp=ref_43203E83 https://t.me/GmailFarmerBot?start=2104251263

Showing the 12 most recent of 288 posts we hold for @apeairdropp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @apeairdropp as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Airdrops Alert Pro
@AirdropsAlertPro · 40,347
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Airdrop” (@apeairdropp), 30,619 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apeairdropp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.