Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ao'nung diary

@aonungdi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003561277127
TypeChannel
Username@aonungdi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 17 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aonungdi

Growth

2213 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 22 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 12:37 — 22 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 04:0114 Aug 2026, 12:37
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:3722no change
13 Aug 2026, 04:0122first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54517046643010164361334.2%
custom 54520890252193024431231.6%
custom 5402231988285379570513.2%
custom 5400330082277428399410.5%
custom 5402460742538534176410.5%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aonungdi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 February 2026 to 8 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 00:38 UTC169 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

с 8 марта мои любимые девочки💖

custom 54517046643010164366custom 54024607425385341762

25 Feb 2026, 03:44 UTC203 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

оценочку

custom 54517046643010164363custom 54003300822774283991

24 Feb 2026, 17:43 UTC195 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @reefprincePhoto

🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊 🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🤩если бы у ирл @aonungdi был инстаграмм… 🩷🦷Парень модель, который не особо любил бы выкладывать новые фотографии с фотосессий и всяких других мероприятий. Ему было бы в кайф выкладывать смешные фотки.

21 Feb 2026, 17:13 UTC153 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

у меня щас все плохо с вдохновением, мне даже баннеры для порта тяжко даются

custom 54022319882853795703custom 54520890252193024433

21 Feb 2026, 17:12 UTC159 views13 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Море никогда не спит. Оно шепчет тихо, заговорщически, на ухо самому берегу. море всегда дышит тяжело и размеренно, поднимая грудь во время прилива и спокойно отпускает в отлив. Оно рассказывает о древних народах о затонувших городах, о кораблях попадавших в шторм и разбивавшихся о скалы, о пиратах Карибского моря принцессах сбегавших из дома ради своих любимых, о множествах признаниях в любви на берегу моря. Оно ра

custom 54517046643010164364custom 54520890252193024434custom 54003300822774283993custom 54024607425385341762

20 Feb 2026, 07:46 UTC95 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @reefprincePhoto

🩷🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊🍊 🌸🌸 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 🌊 тема:: как бы выглядел ваш инстаграм, опираясь на ваш профиль/канал 🪽условия:: • быть подписанным на мой тгк. • репостнуть в свой канал этот пост. • написать свой юз/юз канала, при необходимости написать, какую аватарку взять. • уважение и терпение🙏. 15 / 20

20 Feb 2026, 01:07 UTC105 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

бля надо людей возвращать, сегодня буду пост и Эдит делать

custom 54520890252193024431

19 Feb 2026, 15:51 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

завтра начну писать пост☕️

custom 54520890252193024434

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @aonungdi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,177,205 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ao'nung diary” (@aonungdi), 22 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aonungdi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.