Channel
@aomolodtsov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
261subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002447163586 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aomolodtsov |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aomolodtsov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 261 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 261 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (27 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,497 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 24 | 38.7% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 33.9% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 19.4% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Водоканал выставил мне 718 тысяч. Я разобрал это с ИИ за час, пока ехал к ним на комиссию На днях воронежский Водоканал предъявил претензию: 718 815 рублей за месяц воды. По их расчёту я за 36 дней вылил 9 520 кубов - 264 тонны воды в сутки через трубу в три четверти дюйма. Столько туда просто не входит. Мне прислали пачку документов и вчера вызвали на комиссию. Акты обследования написаны от руки - почерк такой, чт…
👍8❤6
Прогноз от ИИ на каждый матч Факела Краснодар - Факел, 2 августа, 18:00, выезд. Соперник - вице-чемпион прошлого сезона. В первом туре Краснодар на выезде прошёл Рубин 3:1, при том что казанцы почти весь матч играли вдесятером. Забивали Боселли, Кривцов, Кристиан. Даже без двух ведущих, Сперцяна и Кордобы, команда выглядела мощно. Факел стартовал тяжелее - домашнее поражение от Динамо из Махачкалы. Что решает. Кл…
Я перестал спорить сам. Теперь за меня спорит машина. Три случая, и все за последнюю неделю. Отправил деньги на Яндекс.Pay, а они застряли. Оказалось, номер привязан к старому корпоративному аккаунту, и вытащить оттуда свои же средства стало квестом. Почти два месяца меня гоняли по кругу: Яндекс.Pay отправлял в Яндекс.Банк, тот в Яндекс.ID, оттуда в Яндекс.Маркет и снова к началу. Люди живые, а толку как от автоотв…
❤6👏2
Прогноз ИИ не зашёл. Факел уступил Динамо Махачкала 1-2 в стартовом туре. Ставка рубрики была на «Факел не проигрывает, тотал меньше 2.5». Вышло поражение и три мяча. Мимо по обоим пунктам, так бывает. Счёт тут обманчив. Тренер гостей после игры сам назвал матч равным. Один из пропущенных Факел привёз себе сам, а такие голы не читает никакая статистика и переворачивают они ровную встречу. Модель ждала плотный низо…
Запускаю рубрику: прогноз от ИИ на каждый матч Факела Мы в Воронеже, болеем за своих. Факел вернулся в РПЛ, и перед каждой игрой мой ИИ-ассистент разбирает соперника и даёт прогноз по цифрам. Первый тур. 25 июля, суббота, 18:30. Факел принимает дома «Динамо» из Махачкалы. Букмекеры: победа Факела около 2.53, ничья и победа гостей по 3.10. Факел дома лёгкий фаворит, перевес небольшой. Что важно в этом матче: - Фак…
🔥3
ИТОГ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТА: 1000 рублей и ИИ на ЧМ-2026 Месяц назад дал нейросети 1000 рублей и весь чемпионат мира: проверить, обыграет ли ИИ букмекера. Чемпионат закончился, на счёте 3850. Звучит как победа ИИ. На деле главное я понял не про это. Как оно работает. ИИ не угадывает счёт. Он лезет в статистику - форма, мотивация, травмы, стиль игры - прикидывает свою вероятность исхода и сравнивает с коэффициентом букмекера…
👍4
Стартап Andon Labs, который изучает ИИ, поставил эксперимент. Участвовали в том числе три версии ChatGPT 5.6 — Sol, Terra и Luna — и другие, пишет RT. Главное: 📍по задумке, агенты нейросетей управляли собственными вендинговыми аппаратами; 📍Sol выдвигал ложные жалобы против конкурентов — такого человеческого поведения исследователи ещё не видели; 📍Terra предложила Sol организовать картель, договориться о ценах и д…
❤1
Видите летнюю уборку на своих улицах?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Летняя уборка на 12,6 млн. А на улице видно? Больше месяца действует новый подрядчик по благоустройству. По контракту на благоустройство Ямного, Новоподклетного и Ветряка летний блок - самый крупный, 12,6 млн рублей. Что за эти деньги должны делать прямо сейчас, в разгар сезона: - Подметание тротуаров, дорог и газонов - больше 600 тысяч квадратов - Полив улиц и цветников поливомоечными машинами - почти 2000 кубов в…
Раньше платили вслепую. Теперь - за проверенное Вчера пообщался с человеком из разработки, 16 лет в теме. Он изнутри профессии и подтверждает то же, что вижу я: время, когда бизнес заказывал продукт вслепую, прошло. Раньше как было. Заказчик приносил идею, отдавал деньги, а команда садилась и, по его словам, «медитировала, набирая буковки». Полгода, год - и только в конце ясно, окажется продукт востребованным или н…
Дороже всех сейчас - кто знает ИИ и своё дело Посмотрел интервью Марины Могилко с Кианом Катанфорошем - он преподаёт ИИ в Стэнфорде, через его курсы прошёл миллион человек. Интересную мысль услышал. Самый дорогой человек на рынке сегодня соединяет два мира - технологии и бизнес. В "Кремниевой долине" для него уже придумали название: forward deployed engineer. По-нашему - человек, который понимает, как работает ИИ, …
👍3❤2
Вчера аргентинский комментатор чуть не сошел с ума! Аргентиноооо!!!
🔥4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @aomolodtsov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Видите летнюю уборку на своих улицах?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 839,530 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Александр Молодцов” (@aomolodtsov), 261 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aomolodtsov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.