This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,925–1,926 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 08:13
1,925
-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:30
1,926
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:21
1,926
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.87%
avg views ÷ 1,925 subscribers
Avg views / post
132
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
17 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
2,249
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Уважаемые коллеги, мы запускаем четвертое ежегодное исследование кадров на рынке фитнеса ❤️
В этот раз мы большое внимание уделяем не только тренерам, но и управленцам (от менеджеров отдельных зон до менеджеров клуба).
Просьба распространить анкету среди своих коллег — это поможет получить объективные данные, которыми мы обязательно поделимся.
Анкета анонимная, а ее заполнение займет у вас несколько минут.
https://…
Маркетинг перестаёт быть главным инструментом роста. Всё чаще рост начинается там, где заканчивается продажа.
Именно вокруг этой мысли строился разговор с Ольгой Силич — коммерческим директором сети фитнес-центров FITBERRI и фитнес-клуба ARMSTRONG.
Главный вывод эфира — стоимость привлечения клиентов продолжает расти, а значит, бороться за каждого нового посетителя становится всё дороже. Поэтому внимание руководите…
🔖Мы запускаем новый этап развития нашего тренерского Telegram-канала и ищем не просто автора контента.
Мы ищем действующего фитнес-тренера, которому интересно развиваться самому, влиять на развитие профессии и стать заметной фигурой в профессиональном сообществе.
Нам нужен не «администратор канала», а «человека, который через 2–3 года станет одним из самых узнаваемых экспертов в тренерском сообществе, а мы готовы д…
📊Форумы АОФИ отличаются тем, что здесь всегда есть место для стратегии, для больших идей и глобальных поворотов. Но ведь результат определяется не только выбранной стратегией, но и тем, насколько хорошо работает операционка.
Именно здесь становится понятно, превращаются ли новые клиенты в постоянных, растёт ли прибыль после запуска нового продукта, справляется ли команда с изменениями и способен ли клуб масштабирова…
Претензии по нарушению авторских прав по использованию изображений.
Получал досудебные претензии24%
Договаривался до суда12%
Судился/выйграл0%
Судился/проиграл0%
Не было пока такого, но хочу знать как себя вести76%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🖥 Кажется, волна претензий по авторским правам на изображения докатилась до самых разных отраслей. Всё больше компаний сталкиваются с требованиями выплатить компенсацию за фотографии, опубликованные несколько лет назад.
Хотим оценить, насколько эта проблема уже затронула фитнес-рынок. Если вы сталкивались с подобной ситуацией, поделитесь этим в опросе. Можно выбрать несколько вариантов ответа.
АОФИ channel
🌐 Последний месяц лета — самое время подготовиться к новому сезону.
Август — период, когда многие клубы обновляют оборудование, открывают новые направления или завершают подготовку к осеннему потоку клиентов.
Если вы давно планировали купить тренажеры, мебель или другое оснащение для клуба, загляните в чат «Фитнес-барахолка». А если у вас есть оборудование, которое больше не используется, — сейчас отличный момент н…
📊 Мы ищем активных инициативных волонтёров, которые помогут нам в проведении фитнес-форума АОФИconnect.Адаптация
Форум про суперспособности фитнеса
Дата: 28-29 августа 2026
Время: с 08:00 до 19:00
Место проведения: Международный центр Бокса и Международный Центр Самбо
Москва Новолужнецкий проезд 13
Функционал:
• регистрация гостей
• помощь в навигации на площадке
• помощь в рассадке экспертов и гостей в зале
• пере…
📣 А вы помните времена, когда любому клубу в любом городе Дальнего Востока было достаточно открыть двери, купить оборудование, нанять тренеров и запустить рекламу. Сегодня этого уже мало: меняется рынок, клиенты, сотрудники, конкуренты. Растут расходы, появляются новые технологии, усиливается конкуренция не только между фитнес-клубами, но и с десятками других способов провести свободное время, позаботиться о здоровь…
🎓 Когда руководителю пора снова стать студентом?
Иногда наступает момент, когда привычных управленческих решений уже недостаточно. Бизнес растет, рынок меняется, появляются новые задачи, а опыт, который помогал двигаться вперед раньше, нужно дополнять новыми знаниями и инструментами.
И в этот момент важно не просто работать больше, а остановиться, посмотреть на свой бизнес со стороны, сверить курс и понять, куда дв…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @aofirus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Претензии по нарушению авторских прав по использованию изображений.
Получал досудебные претензии24%
Договаривался до суда12%
Судился/выйграл0%
Судился/проиграл0%
Не было пока такого, но хочу знать как себя вести76%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 751,767 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АОФИ channel” (@aofirus), 1,925 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aofirus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
