Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anyagrapes

Channel

Anyagrapes

@anyagrape

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,085subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001197243639
TypeChannel
Username@anyagrape
Created31 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anyagrape

Growth

15,08515,12815,106.56 August 2026 — 15,120 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,120 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,114 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,101 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,100 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,128 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,119 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,102 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,087 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,086 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,085 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,079–15,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:3615,085-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:3615,086-1
13 Aug 2026, 10:2515,087-15
12 Aug 2026, 10:2515,102-17
11 Aug 2026, 10:2515,119-9
10 Aug 2026, 12:4415,128+28
9 Aug 2026, 14:1415,100-5
8 Aug 2026, 16:0615,105+4
7 Aug 2026, 18:3215,101-13
6 Aug 2026, 16:4115,114-6
6 Aug 2026, 04:4515,120no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:3815,120first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.1%
avg views ÷ 15,085 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,510
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held12 (26 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total78,110
Reactions total4,944
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,577 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52223954283596591863,26371.3%
custom 519284083927288330254311.9%
custom 54724049678536756074419.64%
custom 54520379365833055592284.98%
custom 5197697352067981591922.01%
custom 5431412249497467557100.218%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,944reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anyagrape. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈3,320 views99 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Я читаю много шотландских блогеров и мне регулярно становится очень грустно смотреть их контент из 300-летних домов. Но не потому что у меня нет такого дома, нет. У меня нет такой памяти о семье, на столько веков. Я очень мало (честно говоря, почти ничего не) знаю об истории родных старше 3 поколений от меня. Где они жили? Есть ли у меня ещё родственники, о которых я не знаю? С этой целью был сдан ДНК-тест – посмот

custom 522239542835965918677custom 519284083927288330217custom 54520379365833055593custom 54314122494974675571custom 54724049678536756071

11 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈4,010 views201 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

2 месяца живем с новой коляской — мне еще с Аглаей очень хотелось её опробовать потому что её советовали ровно все подруги с детьми 🐰🐰 Joolz Aer, у нас в версии 2! Что сказать, восторг. Я люблю нашу огромную стационарную коляску, но облегченный вариант очень важен, тем более он останется примерно до 3 лет. Мы много чего пробовали, но эта для младенца – лучшая из всех. Коляска легкая (6,5 кг), складывается букваль

custom 5222395428359659186172custom 545203793658330555929

10 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈4,970 views907 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Мне сегодня 37 ❤️🤩 Честно говоря, пока что лучший возраст, никогда я не ощущала себя настолько же собой. Традиционно говорю вам спасибо, что были со мной весь этот год!

custom 5222395428359659186733custom 519284083927288330295custom 547240496785367560761custom 54314122494974675579custom 54520379365833055599

5 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈7,240 views520 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

К слову об энергичности: напекла оладушек и для мышиного дома Аглаи тоже. Каждый, каждый раз Аглая над этим смеется!

custom 5472404967853675607293custom 5222395428359659186152custom 545203793658330555975

5 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈6,850 views405 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сейчас был тот самый момент, когда впервые после родов вдруг понимаешь, что ты снова ты 🍒 Собственно неудивительно: в работе 2 проекта, вопреки всему они делаются с какой-то неуемной энергией (как выразилась моя подруга и по совместительству продюсер Маргарита, «ты пугающе мощная»). А может просто день рождения на днях и что-то там во льве, но боже как я по себе такой скучала!

custom 5222395428359659186311custom 519284083927288330245custom 519769735206798159139custom 545203793658330555910

4 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC≈6,900 views360 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Испекла оладушки Аглае (без сахара, с бананом, получается очень вкусно), достала красивую посуду. Тома подарила баночку домашнего варенья из садовых яблок (на секундочку, этикетку с яблочками она тоже сама нарисовала), открыли. Жить – сейчас, не копить в серванте посуду и варенье, не жалеть цветы в саду и срезать в домашний букет, чтобы радовал и дома тоже. Посуду заказывала у Лизы, рецепт оладьев: Мука рисовая,

custom 5222395428359659186298custom 547240496785367560730custom 519769735206798159125custom 54520379365833055594custom 51928408392728833023

3 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈7,820 views377 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Рано утром пришло сообщение – написала девушка: «Аня, спасибо! Я достала со шкафа камеру впервые за год и поснимала на рассвете, так сильно захотелось». И это моя сама большая награда за всё проекты, всегда. Про фотопрактику можно почитать здесь!

custom 5222395428359659186331custom 545203793658330555929custom 547240496785367560717

30 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC≈9,220 views383 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Скоро ❤️🤫

custom 5192840839272883302266custom 5222395428359659186105custom 545203793658330555910custom 54724049678536756072

29 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC≈8,850 views693 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Нас снова нарисовала Наташа Тарасова! ❤️ С новым членом семьи! Обе работы повешу в детской.

custom 5222395428359659186587custom 519284083927288330267custom 547240496785367560737custom 54520379365833055592

28 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC≈7,320 views227 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Почему в детстве у нас не было ничего, но было столько вдохновения? В каждой соц.сети, самый популярный вопрос от читательниц: где же отыскать его снова? Казалось бы, мы живем с телефоном в продолжение руки, в нём сколько угодно вдохновительных примеров. Но мир рилс с их завлекающими крючками внимания привел нас всех в точку, где кто-то всегда может лучше, чем ты и при этом в этом мире всё вторично. Зачем начинать

custom 5222395428359659186185custom 519769735206798159128custom 545203793658330555914

27 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC≈5,930 views405 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️Неделька июля, лента ⭐️⭐️⭐️телефона. Своим месяцем можно и нужно поспамить в комментариях!!

custom 5222395428359659186312custom 519284083927288330250custom 545203793658330555943

26 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC≈5,680 views367 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Главное, за что я так люблю фотографию – альбомы это омуты памяти. Можно бесконечно откладывать фотосессии, до лучшей формы, веса (а потом спустя годы осознать, что ты выглядела прекрасно), чего-то там ещё, но жизнь идет. На этой ноте мы с самым великим даром декретной жизни - моими ближайшими сейчас подругами, забежали в цветной UU на Покровке, сделать несколько портретов (и обновить аватарки чата на троих). Сове

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @anyagrape. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 655,420 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anyagrapes” (@anyagrape), 15,085 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anyagrape.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.