Channel
@anyagorbunowa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
653subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001764359684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anyagorbunowa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anyagorbunowa |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:25 | 653 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 659 | +1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 658 | -1 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 659 | -3 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 662 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 661 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 662 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 662 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
114 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 58.8% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 19.3% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 11.4% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Есть за мной грешок: я просто обожаю замечать ошибки тех, кого уважаю и с кого можно брать пример 😁 Ибо если они — носители определённого уровня достижений, до которого нам ещё идти и идти, лет так 10,— делают такие ошибки (будь то в письменной или устной речи, или на деле, особенно таких, которых мы бы не сделали), то у нас тоже есть шансы 😁 Как-то так у меня в голове. Меня это всегда вдохновляет, потому что изначал…
❤6🔥3
✍️ Михаил Шуфутинский печатает
😁8
Многие сейчас не понимают, что происходит в экономике и в обществе — и что делать с контентом. Едут на старых правилах, как научились. Перестроиться сложно, это правда сложно. Если раньше работало, сейчас так не работает — и начинают ещё сильнее нажимать, давить на аудиторию. Мне неинтересно собирать хлебные крошки со стола, бегать за клиентами, гонять по кругу чужие намерения. Мне интересна форма: как именно у мен…
❤3
Я статью вам до 4 утра писала. Скоро будет дроп
❤2
Надо сказать, болит абсолютно всё. Бывает же: только проснулся, и сразу под грузовиком с чем-то пахучим. Чтобы встать пришлось отодвинуть надгробие. Чувствую себя вампиром, который зачем-то восстал на рассвете. И птички поют: не вылазь, убьёт! Но, ничего. Сейчас заварю кофе, бахну туда Лагавулин, умоюсь как следует. Под душем, конечно, потянет блевать, но это не страшно - это мы уже видели. И бритва тупая, и все кру…
❤6
Прочитайте это, умоляю 🤣 И вытащите меня из этого творческого рая. Мне продавать надо, лиды стынут
😁5
Мои капризы теперь выглядят так 😂 ПС: кто сп*здит, найду и съем ❤️
🤣7
Все в эйфории от того, что Claude бесплатно монтирует теперь нам рилсы, и очень недурно! Рассказываю, как вам настроить это у себя. Монтаж — то место, где регулярность обычно и заканчивается. Один ролик руками — от 15 до 60 минут: при ежедневной выкладке это полдня в неделю, а часто и больше. Отдать монтажёру — 1500 ₽ за ролик: 45 000 ₽ в месяц при одном ролике в день и 135 000 ₽ при трёх. И по факту большинство из-…
❤3
Дорогие, важное напоминание ❤️ Для того, чтобы делать то, что нужно и то, что даст вам то, чего вы хотите, не обязательно биться в эйфории от того, как же вам хочется написать и выложить контент или написать стратегию или сделать нужный материал прямо сейчас😁 Можно просто сделать.
❤8
Сбой в работе Рунета вызван перебоями в подаче электроэнергии на крупном узле связи, сообщил доменный регистратор "Рег.ру".
Новый текстовый логотип инстаграм*) Все смотрят со скепсисом, но на самом деле в такой визуал направлен мировой тренд * Принадлежит Meta, признанной экстремистской и запрещенной в РФ
🦄1
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anyagorbunowa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если бы можно было выбрать одно, что бы вы выбрали?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Горбунова” (@anyagorbunowa), 653 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anyagorbunowa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.