🎙Thank you Swarnavahini TV for inviting me to today’s program. It was a great opportunity to share my thoughts and experiences.
❤22custom 54360883393064126266🔥4

Channel
@anuhasreal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
220subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001607662297 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anuhasreal |
| Description | Contact [email protected] Contact @januhas |
| Created | 14 June 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anuhasreal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 220 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 220 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 14 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
265 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 109 | 41.1% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 25.3% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 6.79% | |
| 😍 | 17 | 6.42% | |
| 😱 | 13 | 4.91% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 4.91% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 2.64% | |
| custom 5436088339306412626 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.755% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.377% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2022 to 29 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anuhasreal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2022 to 29 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎙Thank you Swarnavahini TV for inviting me to today’s program. It was a great opportunity to share my thoughts and experiences.
❤22custom 54360883393064126266🔥4
This guy is trying to swap his Lamborghini Urus and Porsche 911 GT3 RS for Telegram gifts🚗. Does that mean Telegram gifts are a better investment than supercars😧?
😱11❤2
🎙My first-ever live interview was aired, focusing on TaskMentor (my recent mobile app) and some viral tech innovations. I’m truly grateful to SLBC for giving me this opportunity🫶.
❤9😍2🔥1🥰1
A guy calling himself "Michael Saylor” invested over $1,000,000 in Telegram gifts. His portfolio has since dropped by more than 30%. Is this really an investment, or just an expensive hobby⁉️?
🤔7
Yesterday, @Durov bought this 🎁gift for his girlfriend’s 25th birthday for $52,600. I know it’s limited, but why is it worth so much⁉️?
🌚6😱2
📺My first live interview
🔥29😍15🎉4
🎙SLBC
🔥23❤13🎉5👍2
😍😍
🔥11🎉5❤4👍4
😌
🔥41🎉4❤🔥2❤1
@helakuru why😅
🤣13
118th Annual Session of IESL🌎
❤16
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @anuhasreal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kaveesha Anuhas” (@anuhasreal), 220 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anuhasreal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.