Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Straw Hat Pirates, Awpiece.

@anuWaps

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

575subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001495736308
TypeChannel
Username@anuWaps
Descriptionopen collaboration's contact @awprobot
CreatedBetween 1 May 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/anuWaps

Growth

5757 Aug 2026, 00:53 — 575 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:01 — 575 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:537 Aug 2026, 01:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 574–576 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:01575no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:53575first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
148.5%
avg views ÷ 575 subscribers
Avg views / post
854
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held19 (6 May 202223 July 2026)
Views total854
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Videos
3
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2025, 01:22 UTC≈2,320 viewsread 7 August 2026

V1-19 milik awp, sudah lama mengklaim hak milik di pf tele & instagram. don't blame the public if they think ur sq is plagiarized cz it is clear that our atb year was earlier. proof?

13 May 2025, 00:10 UTC≈2,780 viewsread 7 August 2026

VII atau vii juga termasuk ya 🦧 fyi, atb boleh di pasang di bio atau di dn.

12 May 2025, 15:46 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 7 August 2026

ㅤ ★ Anuwaps open gate vol OO1. The first follow the rules and use identity. Fyi we have rprl system, all gender & rpiw. Tap on the link below and see you to .close ★

11 Aug 2024, 07:07 UTC≈3,220 viewsread 7 August 2026

certificates from the official sensus channel is verified to be true. so please for beginners who want to set up a squad, understand and accept. locked is still locked, not using it doesn't mean it can be used by other founders. no need to ask again, right? thankyou.

7 Jul 2024, 03:53 UTC≈3,120 viewsread 7 August 2026

a little notification for everyone from our side, anuwaps there is no news about open members yet, thank you!

8 Mar 2024, 08:31 UTC≈5,460 viewsread 7 August 2026

tolong ya yang bukan member/calon member awp jangan memakai atb awp 👍

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @anuWaps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 212,797 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Straw Hat Pirates, Awpiece.” (@anuWaps), 575 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anuWaps.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.