Channel
@antonmust
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001836092716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @antonmust |
| Description | Пишу про свой путь от идеи создания цифровой платформы MUST до выхода компании на биржу 📈 Меняю рынок найма Водителей-профи, развиваю онлайн-Биржу ProDrive 🙋🏻♂️ Заметки, Мысли, Опыт, Наблюдения, Факапы, Полезняк, Рецепты (подходят не всем) 😎 |
| Created | 9 December 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/antonmust |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 48 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 48 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (9 December 2023 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 249 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
52 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 23 | 44.2% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 21.2% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2023 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔤 Founder, owner, разработчики и агентные модели продолжают работать в одной базе знаний — без повторного discovery, бесконечных пересказов и потери принятых решений. Это резко сокращает объём неправильной разработки, стоимость коммуникации и время до выпуска следующей версии. 3️⃣ Компактная инженерная команда превращает прототип в промышленный продукт и запускает непрерывный цикл улучшений Для относительно просто…
👍5🔥4😍1
Старый процесс разработки закончился. Мы перестраиваем всё — от discovery до delivery ✔️ Скажу прямо: для ранней стадии большинства цифровых продуктов классический процесс разработки стал слишком длинным, дорогим и избыточным. Исследование, бизнес-анализ, UX/UI, проектирование, разработка, тестирование, согласования — и только через несколько месяцев первая встреча с реальным пользователем... Бизнес успевает потра…
Channel name was changed to «Антон MUST • Дорога к Мечте»
🙋🏻♂️ А как вы понимаете, когда нужно продолжать путь, а когда — менять гипотезу?
❤1
«Где выручка?» — справедливый вопрос акционера. Несколько дней назад такой разговор заставил меня задуматься о длинной воле — способности годами двигаться к цели, когда путь оказывается сложнее первоначального плана. Но длинная воля — не слепое упрямство. Упрямство повторяет одну и ту же попытку. Длинная воля меняет попытку, сохраняя цель. Братья Райт четыре года шли к первому полёту продолжительностью 12 секунд.…
❤3
Откуда я беру энергию, чтобы вставать по утрам и каждый день создавать будущее? Всем привет 👋 Давно не виделись! Часто слышу обсуждения на тему выгорания предпринимателей, очень актуальный вопрос, особенно для основателей стартапов. День за днем, неделя за неделей, месяц за месяцем, год за годом нужно идти вперед и полностью игнорировать физическую усталость, неудачи, критику, черпая из них новые знания и опыт. …
🔥9❤4💯1
Сила нетворкинга безгранична 🦾 Вчера встретился со своим близким товарищем, увлеченным ИТ-предпринимателем из рынка недвижимости. Давно не виделись, много новостей, много идей обсудили, обменялись полезными контактами и в обсуждении коснулись темы нетворкинга 🙋🏻♂️ И тут у меня наступило полное осознание реальности, в которой живут технологические предприниматели в России! Рынок на столько компактный, что найти кон…
🔥7👍4❤2
Всем привет 👋 📌 8 августа в 13.00 на Венчурном ландшафте от МИК я буду принимать участие в прикладной дискуссии «Привлечение инвестиций стартапами ранних стадий посредством ЦФА». Состав спикеров обещает горячую дискуссию. Сессия не только про привлечение инвестиций, а сокрее про новые возможности, которые открываются для компаний ранних стадий (стартапов) в России с учетом нового регулирования и технологий (включая…
🔥3👍1
Друзья, всем привет! 👋 Давно не писал и тут вдруг появилась энергия, пара свободных минут и отличный кейс, которым хочу поделиться! Cпойлер: речь пойдет про использование ChatGPT для поиска, подбора и анализа кандидатов Senior FrontEnd Developer (разработчик для нашей платформы ProDrive). 2 дня назад мы разместили вакансию Senior React FrontEnd Developer WEB на HH,ru и к нашему общему удивлению получили почти 300 …
👏3
#полезняк Наткнулся на очень интересный сервис с большим количеством тестов (в том числе для бизнес-контекста), возможно Вам тоже пригодится: https://tiplichnosti.ru/
❤1
Я в восторге 😎 🚀
[2] Если бы практика проведения подобных ретритов стала настолько распространенной, что даже зрелые компании, в которых доминируют политики, начали это делать, мы могли бы количественно оценить старение компаний по средней глубине организационной структуры приглашенных. [3] У меня также есть другой, менее оптимистичный прогноз: как только концепция режима основателя утвердится, люди начнут злоупотреблять ею. Основат…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @antonmust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 664,060 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антон MUST • Дорога к Мечте” (@antonmust), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antonmust.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.