Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Российский Антитромботический Форум

@antitrombru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

382subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003113533035
TypeChannel
Username@antitrombru
DescriptionНаучно-образовательный проект национального масштаба, он объединяет кардиологов, неврологов, терапевтов и специалистов других направлений медицины. Сайт: https://antitromb.ru/
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/antitrombru

Growth

3827 Aug 2026, 11:03 — 382 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:05 — 382 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:038 Aug 2026, 06:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 381–383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:05382no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:03382first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 382 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.5
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total471
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
123
Videos
15
Links
101

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 01s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2043.5%
🔥919.6%
👍715.2%
❤‍🔥36.52%
👏24.35%
🤝24.35%
custom 523342099595555654212.17%
👌12.17%
🥰12.17%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @antitrombru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @atp_cardiology_newsPhoto

Прямые пероральные антикоагулянты у пожилых с фибрилляцией предсердий: инсультов стало меньше — но не у всех одинаково За 23 года датская система здравоохранения прошла путь от варфарина к эпохе прямых пероральных антикоагулянтов. Что это изменило для пожилых пациентов с фибрилляцией предсердий — в зависимости от возраста? Общенациональное исследование 243 938 пациентов с впервые выявленной фибрилляцией предсердий (

1

6 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC54 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️IV Всероссийский конгресс с международным участием «День борьбы с тромбозом в России» Ведущая в России профессиональная площадка, в преддверии Всемирного дня борьбы с тромбозом (World Thrombosis Day), открывает регистрацию на IV Всероссийский конгресс с международным участием «День борьбы с тромбозом в России». 💧Это не просто ежегодное событие – это возможность напрямую повлиять на качество и исходы вашей клиниче

1❤‍🔥1🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️Внимание, коллеги! Совсем скоро — 10 октября 2026 года — в Москве состоится главное событие года в области антитромботической терапии: IV Всероссийский конгресс с международным участием «День борьбы с тромбозом в России». Мероприятие пройдёт на площадке «Президент-отеля» (ул. Большая Якиманка, 24) и соберёт ведущих экспертов со всей страны. Конгресс проводится при поддержке Российской академии наук, а среди спике

1👍1

23 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @scardioruPhoto

Уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем вас принять участие в онлайн-семинаре «Новости Всемирного конгресса по тромбозу и гемостазу ISTH 2026», который состоится в пятницу, 24 июля, в 16:00 (мск). В рамках вебинара Никита Валерьевич Ломакин представит ключевую информацию о новациях в области изучения тромбоза, антитромботической терапии и клинических рекомендаций по следам ведущего мирового форума в области тромбоза и гемост

1👍1

22 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🫀В Париже прошел воркшоп ISTH 2026! 10 июля на базе Исследовательского центра Сент-Антуан (CRSA) Университета Сорбонны собрались ведущие мировые эксперты в области тромбоза и гемостаза. На воркшопе выступил Никита Валерьевич Ломакин — доктор медицинских наук, сопредседатель Совета по тромбозам Российского кардиологического общества. В ходе воркшопа, где также выступали мировые лидеры — Joseph Caprini, Alok Khorana

2👍1

20 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC81 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Предлагаем вашему вниманию публикацию в журнале «Национальное здравоохранение» — официальном рецензируемом издании, главным редактором которого является Министр здравоохранения Российской Федерации Михаил Альбертович Мурашко. Статья подготовлена командой экспертов под руководством Никиты Валерьевича Ломакина (соавторы: И.В. Зотова, С.В. Аллахвердиева, И.Ю. Ткач). Это пилотное исследование, которое должно стать настол

👏2🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 05:55 UTC101 views3 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @scardioruVideo

С 11 по 15 июля проходит 34-й Конгресс Международного общества по тромбозу и гемостазу (ISTH 2026) — одно из крупнейших международных научных мероприятий, посвященных вопросам тромбоза, гемостаза и антитромботической терапии. Сопредседатель Совета по тромбозам Российского кардиологического общества Никита Валерьевич Ломакин совместно с академиком РАН Александром Давыдовичем Макацария делятся впечатлениями с площадки

3

9 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC137 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, коллеги! 🫀 У нас важная новость — завтра, 10 июля, в Париже стартует международный воркшоп ISTH 2026 Congress! Мероприятие пройдёт на базе Исследовательского центра Сент-Антуан (CRSA) Университета Сорбонны. Участие — гибридное: можно приехать в Париж или подключиться онлайн через Zoom. 🗓 Завтра, 10 июля, начало в 15:00 по парижскому времени. Это абсолютно бесплатно, но регистрация обязательна: https://doc

2🔥2🤝1

6 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC132 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️Уважаемые коллеги! Сегодня, 6 июля, мы отмечаем Всемирный день кардиолога 🥰— праздник всех, кто посвятил свою жизнь борьбе с сердечно-сосудистыми заболеваниями и сохранению жизни. 📌Кардиология сегодня — это сложнейший симбиоз фундаментальной науки, передовых технологий и самоотверженного труда. И в центре этого симбиоза — вы, врачи, ежедневно принимающие решения, от которых зависят судьбы пациентов. Российский а

🔥2❤‍🔥1👍1🥰1

6 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC290 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫀Друзья, коллеги, у нас отличная новость, которой хочется поделиться! 10 июля 2026 года в Париже состоится международный воркшоп ISTH 2026 Congress на базе Исследовательского центра Сент-Антуан (CRSA) Университета Сорбонны. Это не просто очередная конференция, а международная встреча, организованная исследовательским отделом CaVITE (Cancer, Vessels, Biology, and Therapeutics) в сотрудничестве с ICTHIC. Формат участ

1👌1👍1

3 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC103 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Коллеги, рассказываем вам про возможности! Новый стандарт кардиологии уже работает. Если вы давно хотели глубоко погрузиться в кардиологию и получить полноценную специализацию — сейчас идеальный момент. С 1 марта 2026 года вступил в силу Федеральный закон №28-ФЗ. Программы переподготовки для врачей стали полностью очными с серьёзным увеличением практических часов. Кафедра кардиологии РМАНПО Минздрава РФ запустила

1 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC103 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔬 Как это было: Российский антитромботический форум в Ростове! 27 июня Ростов-на-Дону стал эпицентром кардиологической мысли. Форум прошел на одном дыхании! Собрались не просто коллеги, а настоящие профессионалы своего дела. Обсудили «горячие» кейсы, поспорили о новых схемах лечения и, конечно, наметили векторы развития антитромботической терапии на ближайшие годы. Отдельный плюс — живое общение и обмен опытом межд

1custom 52334209959555565421

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @antitrombru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 127,769 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Российский Антитромботический Форум” (@antitrombru), 382 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antitrombru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.