Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Antipedo

@antipedo

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003258442137
TypeChannel
Usernames@antiabuse @antipedo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 18 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/antipedo

Growth

778078.56 August 2026 — 77 subscribers6 August 2026 — 77 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77 subscribers12 August 2026 — 78 subscribers14 August 2026 — 80 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:2780+2
12 Aug 2026, 23:1578+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:1677no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:1077no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:3277first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
218.1%
avg views ÷ 80 subscribers
Avg views / post
175
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (18 January 202627 July 2026)
Views total349
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC200 viewsread 9 August 2026

EU Parliament Vote on "Chat Control 1.0" — What Was Decided and What Was Not On 9 July 2026, the European Parliament voted on reviving the ePrivacy derogation — commonly called "Chat Control 1.0" — which permits, but does not require, platforms to scan communications for known child sexual abuse material. The derogation had expired on 3 April 2026 after Parliament rejected its extension in March. The outcome: 314 M

14 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC216 viewsread 9 August 2026

How to Find the Right Reporting Channel in Your Country Reporting guides list international channels. They rarely explain which one applies to you. This is the order to follow. 1. Check INHOPE first. INHOPE operates a network of national hotlines. If your country is covered, this is the fastest route: reports are handled locally, in your language, by analysts trained to assess the material. inhope.org/report 2. If

21 Jun 2026, 00:33 UTC355 viewsread 9 August 2026

EU Opens Formal DSA Investigation into X over Grok and AI-Generated Abuse Content On 26 January 2026, the European Commission opened a formal investigation against X under the Digital Services Act (DSA). The proceeding examines whether the platform properly assessed and mitigated the systemic risks linked to the integration of its AI tool Grok. The investigation covers the dissemination of illegal content, includin

13 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC366 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

Between 2020 and 2024, reports of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to NCMEC's CyberTipline nearly doubled — rising from approximately 18 million in 2020 to 36.2 million in 2023, with over 100 million files included. The 2024 figure (20.5 million) reflects a reporting methodology change, not a decline in abuse. The Internet Watch Foundation confirmed more than 275,000 CSAM-hosting URLs in 2023 alone — its most extr

25 May 2026, 21:48 UTC541 viewsread 9 August 2026

🔄 Antipedo | Updates Resume After a pause, Antipedo resumes its updates on child online safety, digital protection and official reporting channels. EU update: the temporary derogation allowing platforms to voluntarily detect CSAM expired after April 3, 2026. The proposed extension was not approved, as EU institutions failed to reach an agreement before the deadline. This does not mean online safety work stops ove

3 Apr 2026, 01:35 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 9 August 2026

⚠️ April 3, 2026 — EU derogation on CSAM detection expires today Since 2021, a temporary EU exemption (Regulation 2024/1307) allowed digital platforms to voluntarily scan for Child Sexual Abuse Material without breaching user privacy laws. Today, that exemption expires — with no permanent regulation in place. In simple terms: platforms that were scanning voluntarily may now face legal uncertainty about whether the

15 Mar 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 9 August 2026

Telegram DSA Reporting (European Union) If you are located in the European Union, you can report illegal content on Telegram using the official DSA reporting system. DSA Report: https://telegram.org/dsa-report The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a European law that requires online platforms to review and process reports of illegal content more transparently and efficiently. This system can be particularly useful fo

10 Mar 2026, 09:20 UTC971 viewsread 9 August 2026

Some reporting guides do not always include official resources for every country. This can make it difficult for people to know where to report suspicious activity. Example: Ivory Coast (Côte d’Ivoire) 🇨🇮 For cybercrime or suspicious online activity, the national unit responsible for digital investigations is: PLCC – Plateforme de Lutte Contre la Cybercriminalité Contact: Email: [email protected] Phone

8 Mar 2026, 00:16 UTC742 viewsread 9 August 2026

⚠️ Important rule Do NOT download, store or share CSAM material. Do NOT try to infiltrate groups or interact with offenders. If you encounter suspicious activity, report it through the official channels below and leave the investigation to the platforms and authorities. Here are some official resources you can use to report CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material). Please report responsibly. Incorrect or incomplete re

21 Feb 2026, 21:38 UTC678 viewsread 9 August 2026

Antipedo is open to responsible volunteers who want to support digital safety through awareness and lawful reporting. We do not collect illegal material. Our work focuses on education, prevention and directing users to official reporting authorities. If you share this approach and want to contribute responsibly, contact @tguin.

19 Feb 2026, 14:25 UTC742 viewsread 9 August 2026

BREAKING NEWS — Prince Andrew Arrested Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, younger brother of King Charles III, has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, according to Thames Valley Police. Police confirmed that a man in his sixties from Norfolk was arrested and that searches are being conducted at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk, including properties linked to him. U

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @antipedo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 119,513 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Antipedo” (@antipedo), 80 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antipedo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.