Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Anticoping

@anticoping

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

696subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001507957627
TypeChannel
Username@anticoping
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anticoping

Growth

696697696.57 Aug 2026, 06:08 — 697 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 697 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:42 — 696 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:087 Aug 2026, 23:42
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 696–697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 23:42696-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:16697no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:08697first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

624 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17327.7%
🔥8713.9%
😁8313.3%
🤣568.97%
416.57%
😢416.57%
🤡396.25%
💯345.45%
🗿142.24%
💩121.92%
🍾91.44%
👎81.28%
🤮71.12%
💊40.641%
😐40.641%
👏30.481%
👻30.481%
🤔30.481%
💘20.321%
10.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 624reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2024 to 27 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Dec 2025, 16:09 UTC≈1,540 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ИИ окончательно убил Чедовский и бабский изи-мод в онлайне (не такой уж изи для Чедов в последние несколько лет). Теперь им придется монетезировать ебало в реальной жизни. @anticoping

👍9💊3

4 Oct 2025, 19:31 UTC≈3,160 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Один из самых распространённых коупов: просто найди себе девушку менее симпатичную, такие будут течь по тебе. Из моего опыта, все в точности наоборот— вместо того чтобы быть тебе по-гроб жизни благодарным, что-то кто-то с сносной внешностью выбрал их, всраток, они будут выискивать в тебе самые мелкие недостатки в подсознательной попытке понять, что с партнёром не так. Чедов, который вряд ли даже посмотрит в их сторо

👍22😁118👎1

5 Apr 2025, 18:22 UTC≈3,980 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы сдохните. Я сдохну. Все сдохнут, потому что занимаются чем-то невнятным вместо поиска выхода из биотюрьмы. Канал боролся за раскоупливание людей, а не за выход из биотюрьмы – так и умер. С этим надо что-то делать. (V)

💩9💯71👍1

22 Mar 2025, 00:22 UTC≈4,210 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новый канал посвященный влиянию чисел, планет и всего остального на нашу жизнь тут, в биотюрьме. Космический блэкпилл @bioprison

🤡36👍6👎4😁32👻2💩2

21 Mar 2025, 23:23 UTC≈3,660 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Канал закрыт

😢28🗿14🍾9😁4🤡3👍21👎1

24 Oct 2024, 16:51 UTC≈4,510 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Наглядная демонстрация того как выглядят отношения на бэтабаксе, и чего реально хотят девушки от бэтабаксеров. @anticoping

👍24😁10🔥2🤮2

5 Sept 2024, 20:35 UTC≈5,600 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Скоро выйдет фильм, вдохновленный идеями блэкпилла. Сейчас он находится на стадии разработки, и на этом канале будут регулярно появляться новости, закулисные материалы и иногда утекать сцены. Одну из них вы можете посмотреть сейчас) https://t.me/filfilms2022

27🤣16😁4👍3😐2

5 Sept 2024, 19:11 UTC≈4,560 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @semantics_of_deathVideo

Классическая ложь. То, что часто преподносят как «требования», на деле — лишь робкие пожелания каким должен быть чед. Хотя ему могут простить даже грубые поступки, по типу избиения. Не ведитесь на эту глупость и лицемерие. Простому парню предъявляют длинный список требований, а в итоге — френдзона. И последнее видео только подтверждает всё остальное. Инцелы. Предел отчаяния

👍39🔥5💯4

10 Jun 2024, 17:31 UTC≈7,730 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сутки тапать, чтобы получить двадцать рублей. Мечта гоя. Чтобы понять всю иронию ситуации, надо сделать небольшое отступление. В трейдинге хомяки – это низ пищевой цепи, тупое гойское стадо, которое подчиняется ажиотажу, и неспособно прогнозировать свои действия из-за тупости и азарта. Именно про них есть хорошая трейдинговая пословица: закупился на хаях – прокатился на хуях. Собственно, одна из основных механик р

👍28🤣11👎21👏1💊1🔥1

29 May 2024, 20:21 UTC≈6,910 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Когда один - сексуально привлекательный, а второй - неликвид, но оба - коуперы: @anticoping

💯20👍6😢5👏21

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @anticoping. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anticoping” (@anticoping), 696 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anticoping.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.