я настолько невезучий, что даже флешку втыкаю правильной стороной только с третьего раза
😁6

Channel
@anti_nakipin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
183subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002573472217 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anti_nakipin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anti_nakipin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 183 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 182 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 182 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
116 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 31 | 26.7% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 23.3% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 12.1% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 6.03% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 4.31% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 4.31% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 3.45% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я настолько невезучий, что даже флешку втыкаю правильной стороной только с третьего раза
😁6
уехал из раскалённой Москвы в глушь тульских лесов веду скромную жизнь агрария, борюсь, как могу, с вредителями - вот и вот ))) придумал название для нового альбома группы "Калинов мост" ДРАТЬ СНЫТЬ Сныть это сорняк, если что, а не глагол
🔥4👍2
если вы редко заглядываете в овощной поддон вашего холодильника, там можно обнаружить даже такое это обычная (немного креативная) белокачанная капуста, если что
🔥9😁4👏2
шок- контент надеюсь, вам не придётся испытывать подобного буквально только что наступил на голубя, примерно в таких обстоятельствах мы оба были не правы, я залип в телефон, а он что-то увлечённо жрал
😱5😐3
некоторые сограждане упрекают меня, типа - старый пень но, если вдруг даже так, то как минимум вот такой
😁8👌3❤1
Про великий русский язык, чтоб уж окончательно закончить тему https://vkvideo.ru/video-24199209_456313243?t=34s
вчера, к несчастью моему, вступил в спор с уникальным персонажем про кино, но не суть вот как можно разговаривать с подобным человеком, хотя возможно, он и не человек)) за такое издевательство над русским языком Пушкин вызвал бы на дуэль а Лермонтов, скорее всего, всадил бы так, сразу
🤣5😱2❤1
ничто так не усыпляет, как лекции профессора истории Бориса Григорьевича Кипниса даже на скорости х2 гарантированный эффект https://vkvideo.ru/@kipnishistoryclub
🔥1
встречались ли вам люди со сложными именами? мне - да, и каждый раз думаю - как же ты сокращённо? (вспоминается Киса, Ипполит Матвеевич) один знакомый грузин по имени Автандил говорил, что он - Авто с таким именем ездить на метро моветон, мне кажется... напишите в комменты, пожалуйста, подобные имена и их удивительные сокращения PS на Митю, кстати, не обижаюсь, но знаю тех Дмитриев, кого это выбешивает
Уже бывало, но повторюсь - лучший фильм про советскую разведку это "Вариант Омега" У Штирлица всё понятно, наши уже у Берлина А вот там - ещё впереди Сталинград, ничего не ясно И начинается игра разведок... Наш Олег Даль против ихнего, очень умного, вообще не карикатурного врага - вступит Япония в войну или нет По итогу приехали сибиряки и раздали всем по щщам))
👍3
вчера была очередная годовщина великого русского поэта, как бы сказал Бродский всякий раз интересно, чтобы сделали с ним, если б вдруг принял не ту сторону а сейчас Высоцкий удобен всем, всей своей неудобностью "Жираф большой, ему видней"
❤5
если вас ещё не утомила та дичь, которую я иногда несу в массы, то вот сертифицированная, дистиллированная дичь во всей красе подписывайтесь, там интересно https://t.me/ditttch
❤🔥5🦄2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @anti_nakipin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
а теперь мини-квиз, без гугла на гербе какой страны больше всего львов?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антинакипин” (@anti_nakipin), 183 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anti_nakipin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.