Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анти 5G

Channel

Анти 5G

@anti5gru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

42subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003313641605
TypeChannel
Username@anti5gru
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 9 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anti5gru

Growth

424342.57 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers22 August 2026 — 42 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 09:1542-1
10 Aug 2026, 16:4643no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:5743first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 10s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬6486.5%
🤯56.76%
💯22.70%
👍11.35%
🔥11.35%
😢11.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 14 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jan 2026, 15:38 UTC67 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8291449 https://www.anti-malware.ru/news/2025-12-15-111332/48409 https://iz.ru/1901635/valerii-kodachigov/v-svyazi-s-otsutstviem-goroda-millionniki-dolzhny-perejti-na-5g-uzhe-v-2026-godu? https://www.comnews.ru/content/241801/2025-10-15/2025-w42/1009/gd-nazvali-datu-aktivnogo-razvertyvaniya-setey-5g-krupnykh-gorodakh? https://rg.ru/2025/11/04/rossijskie-operatory-sviazi-ozhidaiut-perehod

🤬5

14 Jan 2026, 15:38 UTC59 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ДУМАЕТЕ, 5G ДАЛЕКО ОТ РОССИИ? ОНО УЖЕ НА ПОРОГЕ! Друзья, пока вы думаете, что 5G - это где-то в Европе или США, в России полным ходом идут планы по запуску этой "технологии" уже в 2026 году! Власти и операторы (МТС, Билайн, МегаФон) рвутся внедрять mmWave и другие частоты в городах-миллионниках. Это значит: вышки повсюду, излучение в ваши дома, вред для здоровья, птиц, пчёл и экосистемы! Что планируют: Запуск 5G на

🤬5😢1

12 Jan 2026, 14:18 UTC60 viewsread 10 August 2026

Что вы думаете? Чувствуете ли изменения в природе рядом с вышками? Пишите в комментариях!

12 Jan 2026, 14:15 UTC115 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚨 ПТИЦЫ И НАСЕКОМЫЕ УМИРАЮТ ОТ 5G ИЗЛУЧЕНИЯ - НАУКА ПОДТВЕРЖДАЕТ! 🚨 Друзья, пока нам говорят, что 5G «безопасен», наука рисует страшную картину: миллиметровые волны (mmWave) буквально убивают насекомых и сбивают с толку птиц, приводя к массовой гибели! 🔬 Ключевые исследования (PDF в посте ниже): \Thielens 2018: насекомые поглощают в 3–370 раз больше энергии на частотах 5G (>6 ГГц). Маленькие пчёлы и жуки нагреваются

🤬6💯1

6 Jan 2026, 08:24 UTC80 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Эх, вот бы поскорее настало лето — на море бы съездить, в Сочи, например!

🤬5

16 Dec 2025, 07:11 UTC153 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Ну что, кто на природу?

🤯5🤬1

13 Dec 2025, 07:47 UTC144 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Эти выводы основаны на данных эпидемиологических и экспериментальных исследований, указывающих на то, что даже низкоинтенсивное радиочастотное излучение может оказывать неблагоприятное влияние на мозг детей, особенно на гиппокамп - область, ключевую для процессов памяти и обучения.

🤬4🔥1

13 Dec 2025, 07:46 UTC142 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

В Швеции и Норвегии зафиксирован настораживающий рост нарушений памяти у детей, который исследователи связывают с усилением воздействия электромагнитного излучения. Об этом говорится в рецензированной публикации в журнале «Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research». В Норвегии число обращений за медицинской помощью по поводу проблем с памятью среди детей и подростков 5–19 лет с 2006 по 2024 год выросло примерно в

🤬4

11 Dec 2025, 12:17 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Если вы столкнулись с подобной ситуацией или слышали о подобном, обращайтесь к @ksandr45621. Каждый случай будет опубликован.

👍1

11 Dec 2025, 12:05 UTC375 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, максимальный репост! Пусть как можно больше людей это увидит! Люди должны знать правду, не проходите мимо! @anti5gru

🤬7💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @anti5gru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анти 5G” (@anti5gru), 42 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anti5gru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.