«На два фронта» в современной русской орфографии

Channel
Serial Experiments Bukharin
@anthropology_of_desistance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003914747721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anthropology_of_desistance |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 9 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anthropology_of_desistance |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 58 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 56 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 55 | +17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 38 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 34 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 34 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 35 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
И в самом деле, представим себе на минуту, что государственная власть поставила своей задачей воздать каждому члену государства в меру его личных потребностей, взять от каждого в меру его личных способностей. Никаких общих, для всех одинаковых норм при такой строго индивидуализированной расценке граждан, очевидно, установить невозможно. Пришлось бы пустить в ход поистине инквизиторские приемы исследования души и тела…
Для подлинного рабочего нет священных и самоценных политических принципов; каждую политическую форму он оценивает лишь как средство улучшить свое положение, т.е. добиться большей обеспеченности и большей свободы. Современный режим признается рабочим классом не потому, что он улучшил его положение в этих двух смыслах, наоборот, и в том и в другом смысле положение пролетариата, бесспорно, ухудшилось, а потому, что все …
👍1
Какое однако точное описание. Чувствуется индивидуальный опыт. Пхпхпхпх
😁2
Serial Experiments Bukharin pinned a file
Упрекая Каутского в бесчисленных подтасовках и подменах, Н. Ленин построил всю свою аргументацию на следующей сплошной подмене. Каутский утверждал, что в стране, созревшей для социалистического переворота, диктатура пролетариата может быть только диктатурой большинства населения, возглавляемого пролетариатом, а потому пролетариат в период социалистической революции не имеет никакого основания уничтожать демократическ…
Отдельно эта статья с распознанным текстом и перенесённым в формат docx
Двухтомник избранных произведений В. А. Базарова («Коммунизм или государственно-упорядоченный капитализм» находится на 239 стр. первого тома, из этой же статьи взяты фрагменты про снабжение из мема выше)
Первым лозунгом большевиков был, как известно, «рабочий контроль»... осуществляемый фабрично-заводским комитетом, избранным всеми рабочими данного предприятия. Но так как диктатура пролетариата фактически лишала предпринимателя всяких хозяйских прав, то рабочий контроль, естественно, приводил к полному отстранению капиталиста и сосредоточению всех организаторских функций в руках фабрично-заводского комитета. В резуль…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣3
Video, posted without a caption
🤯1
Ахахахахах
🤯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @anthropology_of_desistance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Serial Experiments Bukharin” (@anthropology_of_desistance), 58 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anthropology_of_desistance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.