Возвращаюсь в работу в ивентах получается

Channel
Anteräizer
@anteraizer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003037719922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anteraizer |
| Description | electronic music creator | dj | event mgmt https://t.me/verystrongplace •SoundCloud https://on.soundcloud.com/iuHuZwuUYqdQuIP2Aw •Inst https://www.instagram.com/anteraizer?igsh=aDRkZHA2eGdsY3lz&utm_source=qr сотрудничество/вопросы @uttpro |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anteraizer |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 119 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 119 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 46.4%
- avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 55.3
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.13%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 884 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 510
- Videos
- 307
- Links
- 117
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5436361314542842050 | 15 | 31.9% | |
| custom 5292094552776130605 | 8 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5456541141073675547 | 8 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5195201812860263582 | 6 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5233193981164143795 | 4 | 8.51% | |
| custom 5393527635764599555 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| custom 5451839745317445204 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| custom 5316506532706265097 | 1 | 2.13% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Еще прям сразу после просмотра мультика- советую отыскать где-то на просторах интернета выпуск с Сергеем Курёхиным из советского проэкта об авангардном искусстве и музыке «Тишина номер 9» Я кстати эти выпуски смотрела когда-то с касеты, но думаю в интернете можно отыскать. Мало что помню, но передача годная, после неё будете очень много и странно думать
custom 51952018128602635823
Процентов на 90% уверена что новый мультик «Непокой» с музыкой Сергея Курёхина-это отсылка к типичной Дурке Отель-это дурка. У всех героев своя разная шиза, свои комнаты-отделения, кого то выписывают, кто то умирает, владеет этим всем супер мутная зав отделением(белобрысая бабка) у которой уже тоже надвигается шиза на фоне долго общения с пациентами. Зайцы-это метафора к галлюцинациям, у кого то их больше у кого то…
Низшая степень человеческого духовного развития
custom 54565411410736755475
Высшая степень человеческого духовного развития-это приходить в «шортиках и кроксах» на модные показы, расплачиваться мелочью в дорогих местах, не красится на свидания, играть на тусовках одно и то же, не платить налоги, игнорировать существование быта, покупать напитки в местном баре мутабора, не уметь готовить, делать дела в последний момент, носить толстовку с гербом страны, никогда не позволять достоверно понять …
custom 54363613145428420504
На показе от volchok сегодня
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54363613145428420502custom 53165065327062650971custom 53935276357645995551custom 54518397453174452041
Я очень пытаюсь собрать подкаст состоящий полностью(ну или хотя бы на 90%) из анрелизов, однако к моменту выкладки половину материала всё равно скорее всего превратятся в релизы. Если у вас есть интересные техновые треки-присылайте! С удовосльствием добавлю, и отметим вас обязательно @uttpro -писать сюда!
custom 54363613145428420502
Если бы у меня был телепорт я бы первым делом посетила какую либо из тусовок от cxema, чем подревнее тем и лучше
custom 52331939811641437953custom 53935276357645995552
Мне всегда очень везет на рандомные знакомства! Стою жду свой ночной автобус, подходит какая-то женщина и говорит что этот номер автобуса отменили из за обстоятельств произошедших сегодня на баррикадной (я боюсь такие слова писать но думаю вы видели в новостях что случилось). По итогу она предложила мне скинутся на такси так как жила в моём же направлении и мы поехали вместе. Я начала спрашивать её о том как вы оказ…
custom 52920945527761306053
Рндм в прайме явно
Внезапный декс Кстати какое-то странное дежавю, мне буквально когда-то снилось как я внезапно посещаю декс, там играет вот такая музыка, всё в оранжевом свете, утром со мной тусуются те же самые люди что и во сне, и какие то детали от декора до действий совпали
custom 54363613145428420503
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @anteraizer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 6,714 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anteräizer” (@anteraizer), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anteraizer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.