Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🍃أنتيكا❤

Channel

🍃أنتيكا❤

@anteka2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

958subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001124662039
TypeChannel
Username@anteka2
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anteka2

Growth

958961959.56 August 2026 — 961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 961 subscribers12 August 2026 — 958 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 958–961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:24958-3
6 Aug 2026, 13:37961no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:58961first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.65%
avg views ÷ 958 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held20 (2 March 202320 July 2026)
Views total35
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Mar 2026, 00:41 UTC180 viewsread 6 August 2026

َسَيعوّضك الله لأنَك رَضيت في الوقت لمّ يكن فيهِ الرضا عليكَ هيّناََ 🖤

Signed Amjad 1997

6 Aug 2025, 22:50 UTC494 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @LunaDann

كيف لك أن تعبر عن حزنك من دون أن تلتفت إليك الطرقات، أو أن تجد نفسك غريباً في أعين المارة، و ترى انعكاس شبحك في المرايا و على واجهات المحلات، كيف لك أن تحزن دون أن تخرج من عينيك نظرات دخانية، و يرمي جسدك بما تبقى من وزنه، فتكون هنا ولست هنا. أن تريد الهرب إلى كل مكان و أيّ مكان، و الجميع ينظر إليك بغرابةٍ كطفرة حزينة بين حشد سعيد. وأنت، أنت تحاول، و ما زلت تحاول و ستزال تحاول حتى تبني من محاولاتك درعاً تحتمي به، لا ل

Signed December

1 May 2025, 09:25 UTC611 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @leenkallasi1

مرّت بثلاث مراحل من الحزن. إنكار... بكاء... برود. والآن، لم يتبقَّ لها سوى الأخيرة: نقطة اللاعودة. كانت الساعة تشير إلى 22:12 حين أمسكت بروايتها القديمة "الليالي البيضاء"، تلك التي قرأتها مراراً في كل مرة احتاجت فيها إلى ضماد خفيف لذاكرة تنزف. لم تكن هذه المرة الأولى، ولن تكون الأخيرة. قراءتها صارت طقساً، كأنها بحاجة لعبور الجسر ذاته في كل مرة كي تصل إلى نفسها من جديد. راحت كلمات زياد الرحباني تدور في رأسها كصدى بع

Signed December

23 Feb 2025, 12:27 UTC637 viewsread 6 August 2026

أَجلِسُ علىٰ حافّةِ الإنهِيارِ، أرىٰ كُلّ شيء ينتهي، كُل شيء حتّى أنا! #amjad

Signed Amjad 1997

18 Dec 2024, 20:25 UTC823 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @LunaDann

-افتح عينيك -لا أريد -عليك أن تفتحهما الآن -كلا لا أستطيع -ثق بي أرجوك... كان يقف وسط إعصار و كل ما يدور من حوله حطام، أحدهم يحاول إنقاذه، لكنه هناك لا يقوى على الحراك، مرتعد، تائه.. دوامات سببت فوضى عارمة، و ثقب أسود يبتلع كل ما يصادفه أمامه، يصبغه بالسواد، أو ينهشه للأبد.. تتناثر الشظايا في كل مكان، فتعكس على أسطحها صوراً باهتة، لأناس يبتسمون تارة، ويتشاجرون أخرى، فيعانقون بعضهم بما تبقى من مودة.. تدور الصور بلا ت

Signed December

4 Nov 2024, 13:01 UTC773 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @LunaDann

انظر للسماء تراها بعيدة، مُدّ كفّك تقترب، ابتسم تحتضنك الشمس حباً، و تعال.. إلى حقل غيومٍ يطفو، إلى حلمٍ يقترب بخفة يلامس وجهَك نسيمُه، إلى هنا للنور للضياء للحياة..

Signed December

14 Sept 2024, 18:17 UTC884 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @LunaDann

”الحلم بشيء وهمي يحمل اسماً. إنه الأمل.“ -جوستاين غاردر

Signed Luna D.

23 Mar 2024, 00:55 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @LunaDann

وقف على الجرف ينظر للسماء الرصاصية و قد توارت شمسها خلف الضباب خوفاً، إنها المرة الأخيرة التي سيرى فيها العالم ينبسط أمامه كأنه لا يخفي شيء و يفتح له ذراعيه مستقبلاً إياه بدمعة حزينة، دقائق أخرى بات المطر يغطي رؤيته بعباءة فضية تعكس نظراته الهائمة. أغلق عينيه و ترك نفسه يندمج مع المشهد حوله، و خطا إلى الامام. خطوة، اثنتان، ثلاث، ثم إلى الفراغ.. امتد الزمن كلحن من نوتة غير منتهية بينما يقترب من الأرض شيئاً فشيء، شعر ب

Signed Luna D.

19 Sept 2023, 08:42 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 6 August 2026

‏دائمًا ما كنت أنا الذي #أركض_وأسعى، للأشياء التي أرغب بها #والاشخاص الذين #أوّدهم عندما #تعبت. لم #يركض_ناحيتي سِوى هذا الكم من #الخيبات.!

Signed Amjad 1997

28 Aug 2023, 00:08 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

من وين عم تابعونا حبابنا ؟

  1. سوريا89%
  2. برا سوريا11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Amjad 1997

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anteka2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2023, 00:08 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

من وين عم تابعونا حبابنا ؟

  1. سوريا89%
  2. برا سوريا11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2023 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,389,261 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍃أنتيكا❤” (@anteka2), 958 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anteka2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.