Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 489–500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 06:55
490
-2
9 Sept 2026, 06:58
492
-4
31 Aug 2026, 04:42
496
-3
23 Aug 2026, 07:13
499
+2
8 Aug 2026, 04:19
497
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:25
497
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 36s
Average length
1m 18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
121 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
87
71.9%
😍
8
6.61%
💯
6
4.96%
🔥
6
4.96%
🍓
4
3.31%
😁
4
3.31%
custom 5240030740170681228
3
2.48%
custom 5373098095540191093
2
1.65%
🕊
1
0.826%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как реально изменить свои стратегии в жизни, чтобы получать другие результаты и по-другому складывались отношения с людьми (без повторяющихся сценариев)
⭐️Это же причина почему я выбрала изучать психоанализ и сама хожу к аналитику 2 раза в неделю
С психологом мы получаем другой опыт отношений. Period.
Мы ведем себя с психологом также, как строим отношения со всеми другими людьми во внешнем мире.
И мы получаем воз…
Прайс на доп услуги психолога:
Не спрашивать про чувства:
8000 ₽
Не спрашивать про мать:
10000 ₽
Просто сказать что с этим делать:
5000 ₽
Смотреть мемы час:
3000 ₽
Разложить таро:
2000 ₽
Расскажу закулисье этих роскошных diva photos
Вообще, я бы никогда не сделала такую съемку
Потому что образ очень авангардный, сценический, high fashion
Благодаря тому, что его подобрал стилист, я примерила такую другую-себя
Сама я привыкла выбирать более проверенные и безопасные формулы. У меня даже нет таких вещей в гардеробе, к пример этот топ стоит 50 тыс₽
Я даже немного пикмуха…
Потому что муж и мужчины в …
Кругляш из серии «угадай че выкину» 😭
Первый раз попробовала автозагар!
Если честно, у меня вау-впечатления от себя такой, хоть часть цвета и смоется
Период жизни, когда хочется направить фокус на красоту, медиа и охваты
Поэтому из планов:
• посотрудничала со студией загара
• завтра будет съемка для блога
• уже привыкла каждый день монтировать и выкладывать рилс, буду продолжать
Вам интересно про рилсы? Набор аудитории + перевод на заработок
Да83%
Нет6%
Хочу больше психологии28%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Смыслы, которые приведут инфантильную аудиторию, которая будет ebat`вам мозги 🙏
Девочки, все сюда блин. Сейчас будем сберегать вам нервы 💅
Есть одна вещь в маркетинге, которая изумительно работала раньше, а сейчас это просто тотальная, критическая ошибка
Это обещание больших и быстрых результатов.
Шок? Да, мы ехали на этом в 2022-2023 году. Это работало, нооо. Сейчас рынок очень поменялся
Выбор людей стал более …
🦪 Откуда брать идеи для продуктов, постов, рилс?
Самое мощное противоядие от выгорания — контакт с собственной душой.
Звучит поэтично, но сейчас приземлим на практику:
Потому что это навык, необходимый каждой женщине, особенно если она намерена вести блог и людей за собой
Прежде чем давать другим, черпать из себя и выгружать идеи — сначала себя нужно напитать.
«Эту способность души часто называют обработкой.
За…
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @anshmigelskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вам интересно про рилсы? Набор аудитории + перевод на заработок
Да83%
Нет6%
Хочу больше психологии28%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Абросимова” (@anshmigelskaya), 490 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anshmigelskaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.