Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for -°𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘢.𝘮𝘦𝘸

Channel

-°𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘢.𝘮𝘦𝘸

@anoramew

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

166subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002366594084
TypeChannel
Username@anoramew
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anoramew

Growth

166173169.511 August 2026 — 173 subscribers11 August 2026 — 173 subscribers17 August 2026 — 168 subscribers24 August 2026 — 166 subscribers11 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 13 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 14:16166-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:56168-5
11 Aug 2026, 09:01173no change
11 Aug 2026, 08:49173first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 166 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.4
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held10 (2 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total464
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51974948615398704981429.8%
custom 5253559642339972371919.1%
custom 5192789076327045305612.8%
💘612.8%
custom 5343968459107621667510.6%
custom 519317485458453628724.26%
custom 537285226879205498524.26%
custom 519320072317255094312.13%
custom 537528604637006449312.13%
custom 538433008355929032712.13%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC27 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

· кстати, я получила еще зеленький стакан, синий мне передали и остался последний оранжевый 😇

custom 51974948615398704982custom 52535596423399723711custom 53439684591076216671custom 53728522687920549851

8 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC34 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

· посмотрите какой он пирожочечек🤭🍧

custom 51974948615398704982custom 53439684591076216672custom 51927890763270453051custom 53843300835592903271

7 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC35 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51974948615398704985💘2custom 52535596423399723712

7 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

· моя первая жертва ❤️❤️❤️

custom 51931748545845362872custom 52535596423399723711custom 53439684591076216671

7 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC35 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

· я ночью уснула, не успела кинуть блен и весь день с утра занята была(

💘2custom 52535596423399723712custom 53439684591076216671

6 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC44 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

· ребзи, маски в закрепе по косарю каждая🎀 заберите кто-нибудь, мне с ними нечего делать

custom 51974948615398704981custom 52535596423399723711

3 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC71 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

· бляо готовка именно так ощущается🙁🫠 короче вот итог, можно считать что я справилась, по вкусу очень легким получился кстати, неплохо вышло🍓

custom 51974948615398704983custom 52535596423399723711custom 53728522687920549851

3 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC69 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

· это пищдец, я пока крошила печенюшки в сливки, в них откуда то появилась вода и они начали чуть-чуть расслаиваться и за ночь эта жижа растеклась по тарелке😭 + мне не хватило их, седня буду пытаться исправить все это...

custom 51927890763270453055custom 51974948615398704981custom 53752860463700644931

2 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘2custom 51932007231725509431custom 52535596423399723711

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @anoramew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 601,034 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-°𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘢.𝘮𝘦𝘸” (@anoramew), 166 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anoramew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.