Channel
@anon_wall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
300subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002345580003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anon_wall |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anon_wall |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 300 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 302 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 302 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 18 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
110 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5418138833457793454 | 44 | 40.0% | |
| custom 5449698107119904829 | 23 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5298998755654133743 | 15 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5201781226016350115 | 7 | 6.36% | |
| custom 5370971163310693562 | 6 | 5.45% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 5.45% | |
| custom 5382164415019768638 | 3 | 2.73% | |
| custom 5463032631954250729 | 3 | 2.73% | |
| custom 5373334855612375386 | 2 | 1.82% | |
| custom 5267287139502016144 | 1 | 0.909% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 29 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anon_wall. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 September 2025 to 29 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Это глюк только у меня или у всяких там Рохманов попропадали верификации с Major? Готовятся к чему-то большому или дорогой друг забрал кормушку?
custom 52989987556541337433custom 54496981071199048293custom 52017812260163501152
Typical TON user behavior: 4:19 — Buy Telegram Gift for X ❤️ 4:20 — Sell Telegram Gift on Pre-market for X — X / random(1..8) ❤️ (me included) 🛒
custom 53709711633106935623custom 54496981071199048293custom 54630326319542507293custom 54181388334577934541
Sticker, posted without a caption
Тем временем старые подарки, аналоги
custom 52989987556541337433
Телеграма нет в «белых списках» сервисов, доступных без интернета, — СМИ со ссылкой на РКН и Минцифры. @ecotopor
custom 54181388334577934543custom 53709711633106935621
Signed new balance
Telegram включили в «белый список» сайтов в России — это означает что он будет работать даже при отключении мобильного интернета. @ecotopor
custom 52017812260163501155custom 54181388334577934542custom 53733348556123753861
Signed new balance
Похоже, мемы снова выходят на сцену? Кто уже в теме MemeRepublic? 🎱
custom 54181388334577934548custom 53709711633106935621
Signed Дмитрий
Не мошенничайте, пацаны https://kod.ru/kriptomoshennik-novak-ubit-v-uae
custom 54496981071199048295
2020 Covid crash: $1.2B in liquidations 2022 FTX crash: $1.6B in liquidations Today: $2.1B in liquidations You wished you bought during the COVID crash. This is your COVID crash. Are you a waiter or a doer?!?! $TON $ANON
custom 54181388334577934546
Signed Mika
💬 Telegram is the best platform for AI bots — and the Perplexity bot is a great example. Try it at t.me/askplex and ask it anything 🧠
custom 54181388334577934541
Signed new balance
Telegram is valued at nearly $30 billion — yet it runs without offices and with only 30 employees scattered around the world. Founded by Pavel Durov in 2013 after leaving VKontakte, Telegram built its empire by standing for privacy, security, and freedom — no ads, no tracking, no nonsense. Today, a team smaller than most startups handles 900+ million users, billions of daily messages, global data centers, and const…
custom 54181388334577934546custom 52989987556541337433custom 53821644150197686382custom 52672871395020161441custom 54496981071199048291
Signed Mika
✈️ Основатель Telegram Павел Дуров выступит 29 октября в 16:00 на форуме Blockchain Life 2025 в Дубае.
custom 54181388334577934541
Signed new balance
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @anon_wall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 52,349 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANON Wall” (@anon_wall), 300 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anon_wall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.