2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76–78 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 20:30
77
no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:30
77
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.7%
avg views ÷ 77 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
31.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
17 (26 February 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
19
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
79
Videos
11
Links
6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
41
50.0%
🔥
18
22.0%
👍
11
13.4%
👏
5
6.10%
❤🔥
2
2.44%
💯
2
2.44%
✍
1
1.22%
🕊
1
1.22%
🥰
1
1.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мозг всегда защищает свои убеждения, какими бы разрушительными для жизни человека они бы ни были.
Поэтому жить привычно легко (даже если это трудная жизнь), а меняться - это не простой процесс. Но всегда очень вдохновляющий 🕊
Сейчас открыта запись на сессии со мной онлайн.
Для записи тг, мах +79787446617
В терапии мы часто используем поведенческие эксперименты — пробуем делать то, что действительно важно для нас, даже когда внутри поднимаются страх, тревога или старые травматические убеждения.
Потому что можно годами анализировать свои травмы, понимать причины своих реакций, но настоящие изменения происходят тогда, когда мы начинаем действовать по-новому.
🌿 Женская встреча «Точка спокойствия»
В условиях нестабильности важно иметь внутри себя точку опоры и спокойствия. На нашей встрече мы будем делать практики, которые помогут:
* успокоиться и заземлиться
* найти внутренний ресурс и безопасность
* научиться переключать внимание на приятные события
✨ В ходе встречи вас ждут: мягкая работа с телом и дыханием, визуализации, упражнения на укрепление внутреннего ресурса …
До конца апреля бесплатная установочная сессия (30 минут)
Я провожу бесплатные установочные сессии (30 минут) для новых клиентов.
Если ты давно думаешь о терапии, но:
— сомневаешься, подойдет ли тебе этот формат
— не понимаешь, с чего начать
— хочешь «почувствовать», твой ли это специалист
— это отличная возможность попробовать 💬
Зачем нужна установочная сессия:
1. Понять, с каким запросом ты приходишь и чего хо…
Сегодня начинается новый месяц в групповой практике "Настали хорошие времена"
Приглашаю новых участников на апрель.💙
Что будет:
🐈 ежедневная практика фокусировки на хороших событиях в своей жизни
🍞 еженедельные практики на выявление и удовлетворение своих ценностей, удачу, восстановление нервной системы.
🩵 поддержка группы
Стоимость: 800 р/ мес.
Для записи: @Anna_vista
Ходила сегодня в кино клуб. Как будто снова в студенчестве побывала.
Для клуба смотрела очень интересное кино, снятое в 1932 году женщиной режиссёром.
"Весело мы катимся в ад"
Весь фильм это сплошные 🚩ред флаги 🚩
Замечательный пример спасательства в отношениях, деструктивных паттернов, созависимости и алкоголизма.
А еще невероятно красивые актеры и костюмы.
#кино
✖️ Небольшое упражнение
Представьте себя в тот момент времени, когда было принято «неправильное» решение.
Не абстрактно, а конкретно:
возраст, обстоятельства, состояние.
И ответьте письменно на три вопроса:
— Чего я тогда боялся(ась)?
— Чего я тогда хотел(а)?
— Какие у меня были реальные ресурсы?
Потом представьте, что перед вами не вы, а близкий вам человек в той ситуации.
Сказали бы вы ему то же самое,
что го…
🔥3💯2✍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @annavista. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 969,375 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психолог Анна Висторобская” (@annavista), 77 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annavista.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.