Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anna Vakh | BIOTECH

Channel

Anna Vakh | BIOTECH

@annavakhbio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,912subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001612071004
TypeChannel
Username@annavakhbio
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/annavakhbio

Growth

1,9041,9121,9086 August 2026 — 1,904 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,904 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,912 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,903–1,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:141,912+3
12 Aug 2026, 01:311,909+5
6 Aug 2026, 06:351,904no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:051,904first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.7%
avg views ÷ 1,912 subscribers
Avg views / post
721
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held17 (19 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total4,323
Reactions total287
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

672 reactions across 17 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29844.3%
🔥15022.3%
❤‍🔥9714.4%
👍263.87%
202.98%
🏆152.23%
💯131.93%
🦄101.49%
👀81.19%
🤩71.04%
🐳60.893%
🍾40.595%
👏30.446%
🤝30.446%
🎉20.298%
💘20.298%
😁20.298%
👎10.149%
👨‍💻10.149%
👾10.149%
3 further kinds30.446%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 672reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 17 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @annavakhbio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC436 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎬 Фильм «Однажды в Проспере» уже опубликован: Проспера — свободный город, где можно создавать свои регуляции, платить налоги в биткоинах и проводить эксперименты, невозможные почти нигде в мире. А стартап Unlimited Bio разрабатывает и тестирует комбинаторные терапии для продления жизни.... То, что запрещено во всем остальном мире. Будем рады поддержке, лайку и комменту, чтобы помочь распространить видео! #однаждыв

❤‍🔥23🔥128🤩2🦄2

29 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC806 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧬 Правда ли, что человек не сможет прожить больше 194 лет из-за мутаций? Сначала хочу поздравить Дмитрия Крюкова, Евгения Ефимова и их команду со статьёй в Nature 👏🏼. Это круто! Плюс многие западные медиа уже разобрали её на заголовки 😁. В своей работе они попытались рассчитать теоретический предел человеческой жизни. Если без всяких преград, то получилось 1759 лет! В общем, если представить мир, в котором мы науч

32❤‍🔥10🔥9👏3💯1😁1

26 Jul 2026, 05:14 UTC756 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎬🍿 Провели премьеру фильма «Однажды в Проспере» в кинотеатре «Октябрь». Это точно останется для нас необычным и очень запоминающимся опытом. Спасибо всем, кто пришёл разделить этот вечер, всей нашей команде, кто помогал и поддерживал, Михаилу Батину, который предложил всё это снять и собрать в фильм, и Ивану — за поднятую планку 😅. Очень хочется, чтобы фильмов о продлении здоровой жизни становилось больше. Чтобы э

34🔥19❤‍🔥7👍5👀1🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC707 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🙌 Друзья, видео про тимус уже на канале. Будем рады лайку, комменту, репосту 🙂. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xConNgcDMA ——————————————— Больше про биотех 👉🏼 @annavakhbio Всегда рада новым знакомствам и интересным проектам на стыке науки, biotech и longevity 🤙.

12👍8🍾4🤝2

23 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC783 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧐 Я упустила, но, оказывается, Брайан Джонсон тоже тестировал протокол регенерации тимуса (в 2023 году) И спойлер: остался не доволен им 😁 #тимус #гормонроста Давайте посмотрим, что там было: За 100 дней терапии (0,6 мг 5 раз в неделю) МРТ показало: • общий объём тимуса +14%; • объём функциональной ткани +23%; • жировая инфильтрация −17%. По их модели это соответствует примерно 7 годам омоложения тимуса. 🧐 Несмо

22❤‍🔥12🔥12

20 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC835 views45 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍿 Пойдёмте в кино! Предыстория: Одна из моих компаний, Unlimited Bio, базируется в специальной экономической зоне на Карибском острове, где мы пытаемся исследовать генетические терапии и проводить клинические исследования с ними для целей лонжевити и превенции возраст-зависимых процессов. Это единственная зона в мире, которая это разрешает! Так вот. Мы снимали ролик на ютюб, но в последний момент решили снять кинот

22🦄7❤‍🔥6🔥6🏆2👍1🤝1

8 Jul 2026, 06:19 UTC≈1,230 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍋 Все уже обсудили аутоиммунный гастрит Брайана Джонсона. Почему-то большинство злорадствует, хотя у каждого наверняка найдутся свои проблемки, только мы об этом не узнаем и нам не расскажут. А здесь история, может, только начинается. Предыстория Главным сигналом у Брайана был низкий ферритин в течение многих лет без анемии. Железо плохо поднималось питанием и добавками, колоноскопия была нормальной, а уже после вер

27❤‍🔥6🔥5💯4👨‍💻1🤔1😱1

2 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,170 views36 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

✨ Рассказываю про замеры тимуса Итак, мы договорились с клиникой Атлас, чтобы внедрить у них МРТ тимуса для его структурной диагностики. И отправились с Ваней на МРТ. Там провели где-то минут 30 в этой шайтан-машине, пока она сканировала тимус. По результатам есть общее морфологическое описание органа, но, что самое важное, показатели: • объём железы; • доля жировой ткани; • степень возрастной инволюции. У Ивана

🔥17❤‍🔥1042🏆2👍1

26 Jun 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,220 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫀 Новая статья про связь здоровья тимуса с возрастными заболеваниями Недавно я читала лекцию про тимус, его возрастную инволюцию и современные подходы к его восстановлению. Вот ещё одна очень интересная работа в копилку. #тимус Исследователи разработали модель искусственного интеллекта, которая оценивает состояние тимуса по КТ грудной клетки, и применили её к двум крупным популяционным когортам общей численностью

44❤‍🔥5👍4💘1

23 Jun 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,040 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎙️ Недавно побывала в гостях у Елены Ваевской и рассказала о своём пути в науку, генной терапии, основных возраст-зависимых заболеваниях, факторах Яманаки и перспективах радикального продления жизни. Думаю, получилось для широкой аудитории, если вам в целом интересны биотехнологии и будущее лонжевити — это хороший выпуск для знакомства с темой. ——————————————— Больше про биотех 👉🏼 @annavakhbio Всегда рада новым зн

16👍4🔥4🏆1🤩1

21 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,130 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎗️ Искореняем рак шейки матки #впч #вакцинация #ракшейкиматки Когда говорят о вакцинах, часто обсуждают антитела, проценты эффективности и снижение риска. Но в идеале результат должен выглядеть именно так. В The Lancet вышло исследование национальной программы вакцинации против ВПЧ в Англии Среди женщин 20–24 лет в период с 2020 по 2024 год не зарегистрировали ни одной смерти от рака шейки матки. Ни одной. То е

8💯5🤩3💘1

16 Jun 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,120 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤧 Почему аллергия может возвращаться спустя годы? Так как аллергия стала ещё одной моей темой интересов и мы занимаемся разработкой аллергопрепарата от кошек, то вот интересное про её «засадников» 😁. #аллергия Долгое время в аллергии всё выглядело довольно просто: 🔹 IgE — плохие антитела. 🔹 IgG — хорошие антитела. Но иммунология, как обычно, оказалась интереснее. 🤧 У аллергологов давно был один парадокс. Если

🔥94🎉2👎1👾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @annavakhbio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 52,155 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anna Vakh | BIOTECH” (@annavakhbio), 1,912 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annavakhbio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.