Channel
@annapaulina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
101subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001656640533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annapaulina |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annapaulina |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 101 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 102 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 100 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 100 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
132 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🫡 | 53 | 40.2% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 14.4% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 13.6% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 10.6% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 7.58% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aside from reconciliation and a fixed version of the NDAA, the Senate will not get any legislation passed in the house as MANY HOUSE MEMBERS will vote against anything the SENATE sends over based on the fact that they are refusing to pass save America act and voter ID. Every single one of these senators that’s claiming to champion this issue could be holding their leadership accountable ie find new leadership. Lip s…
👍4
@AnnaPaulina
🔥3👎1
We cannot trust Congress when lawmakers are making decisions based on what will benefit their stock portfolios instead of what will benefit the American people. Today is the day we finally vote to ban congressional stock trading. #lunacore @AnnaPaulina
🔥5💯4
Great speech 🎤 @AnnaPaulina
❤4
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 @AnnaPaulina
❤4👍2
Remember: of all the countries paying people to destroy the U.S., CHINA leads the way. They are running a well funded psy-op online and through moguls like Neville Singham targeting political movements, in addition to agro-terrorism. @AnnaPaulina
🫡6👍2
The House will literally attach Voter I.D. and Proof of Citizenship to EVERY SINGLE PIECE of legislation we send to the Senate. @AnnaPaulina
👏5🫡2
The House is doing its job, now it’s the Senate’s turn. All eyes on John Thune. If SAVE America fails all of America will know who to blame. @AnnaPaulina
🫡5💯3👎1
When 6 young kids all develop the same rare form of cancer in the same small community, parents have the right to ask questions. Parents also have the right to question the link to cancer causing chemicals used in pesticides. I still can’t believe Congress was trying to provide liability shields for these pesticide corporations that are poisoning our children with toxic chemicals. Heartbreaking. https://people.com/…
🫡4💯3👍2
If you are not an American, you do NOT get to vote in our elections. Now that Congress is back in session it’s time to secure our elections. LUNACORE: ACTIVATED 😎 @AnnaPaulina
❤4👏2🫡1
HAPPY BIRTHDAY AMERICA, keep it 100 for 250! 😎🇺🇸 @AnnaPaulina
🫡5❤3
The Speaker has worked very hard to try to get the Senate to move on SAVE America, but this is the type of stuff I’m talking about. Now, even under Reconciliation 3.0 the Senate is still trying to disrespect the American people. In the past, they could hide behind lack of transparency. Not anymore. I will also be fully backing the Speaker’s efforts on his Reconciliation however, as you can see the Senate is already…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @annapaulina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anna Paulina Luna” (@annapaulina), 101 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annapaulina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.