Будущего здесь больше нет... ближайшие несколько лет точно... Скажите мне, что это все плохой сон

Channel
Annagraz
@annagraz_art
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002897408233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annagraz_art |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annagraz_art |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:15 | 15 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 16 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 16 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 9 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
94 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 20.2% | |
| custom 5339293035018594854 | 14 | 14.9% | |
| custom 5888515392493590220 | 13 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5890888606737767028 | 11 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5888701476246657603 | 8 | 8.51% | |
| custom 5389076323069089723 | 7 | 7.45% | |
| custom 5425098428528998967 | 7 | 7.45% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 5.32% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 5.32% | |
| custom 5890823529393297388 | 4 | 4.26% | |
| custom 5361781720003653890 | 1 | 1.06% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Я могу просто по 5 часов сидеть перед открытым скетчбуком и ничего не родить... сегодня буквально этот день 😞 Как это лечится? *скетч на фото месячной давности*
custom 58885153924935902203custom 58887014762466576033
Хотела вчера старый скетч переделать, чтобы было больше сходства, но... все равно не вышло. Все таки навыки деградируют без постоянной практики
❤5custom 53617817200036538901custom 58887014762466576031
Извините, мне просто хотелось высказаться 😭
custom 58908235293932973884
Все хотела сделать пост и похвастаться обручальным колечком Рафаэля, что даже сделала маникюр в тему его свадебного баннера. Но... в связи с последними событиями в LADs, хочу сказать, что больше не буду публиковать рисунки по этой игре на своей странице. Я очень разочарована и расстроена действиями компании. Нет желания не только играть, но и советовать её впринципе, так как не понятно по какому пути пойдет дальнейше…
custom 58885153924935902204
Нашла для себя хороший антистресс во время работы 🥸 Сильно стрессанула, что даже 5-мин. прогулка не помогла. Решила быстро нарисовать какую-нибудь смешную картинку, и помогло! Сохраняйте лайфхак ✍️ главное, чтоб босс не видел...
custom 58908886067377670288custom 58885153924935902204custom 53890763230690897231
Наращиваю темп, один скетч в два месяца 🥸✨
❤6custom 53392930350185948542custom 58887014762466576032custom 54250984285289989671
Полноценок пока нет и не будет, я борюсь сама с собой... Предлагаю вам пока выбрать вариант для моей дакимакуры с Рафаэлем 🥵 #loveanddeepspace
custom 53890763230690897236custom 58887014762466576032
Поныла, вкинула картинку и пошла спать.... 🐾 ну да, я второй пункт - редкость, ну а что вы хотели
custom 53392930350185948547custom 58885153924935902202custom 54250984285289989671
Я не знаю где брать время на все свои хотелки 😞 Есть курсы по тайм-менеджменту?? Уволиться с РАБоты не получится, иначе придется с мышами за хлеб драться. А я ведь проиграю..... Помогите.........
🤔5
Annagraz pinned «Ввиду последних удручающих событий оставлю вам ссылочки на меня в других соц. сетях: тви https://x.com/annagraz_ вк https://vk.ru/annagrazz Позже добавлю тик ток (так как с количеством потраченного в него времени, я давно его удалила 🥲) и ,наверное, тамблер?…»
Ввиду последних удручающих событий оставлю вам ссылочки на меня в других соц. сетях: тви https://x.com/annagraz_ вк https://vk.ru/annagrazz Позже добавлю тик ток (так как с количеством потраченного в него времени, я давно его удалила 🥲) и ,наверное, тамблер? этот динозавр ещё жив? Из тг я не собираюсь пока никуда уходить. Мне правда стало тут чуточку комфортнее, поэтому я хочу сохранить этот вайб, особенно в тако…
custom 54250984285289989675
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @annagraz_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Annagraz” (@annagraz_art), 15 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annagraz_art.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.