Channel
@anna_o_designe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
63subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002218933025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anna_o_designe |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anna_o_designe |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 63 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 62 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 61 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 60 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 61 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 61 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 36.7% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 26.7% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На ловца и зверь бежит. Сейчас в работе большое пространство в Москве, и уже готовы первые эскизы, не без участия ИИ Конечно, нейросети не сделают за вас работу, но если подходить к процессу с головой, можно делегировать и ускорить часть работы Вот вам пример: один из кабинетов. На первом фото — мой эскиз, а на втором обработка нейросеть, чтобы заказчику было понятнее Если раньше на подобную визуализацию потребов…
🔥5❤3
Я обожаю стиль mid-century, поэтому тренд на wall-to-wall wood — просто в самое сердечко🤍 Раньше такой приём был роскошью: чтобы добиться этого цельного, обволакивающего эффекта, использовали в основном массив или натуральный шпон, а это сразу 100500 денег и не всегда просто в реализации. Сейчас у дизайнеров гораздо больше возможностей: - бамбуковые панели - бюджетный ЛДСП - керамогранит, в том числе крупноформатны…
❤5😍2
Больше 66 тысяч!!! просмотров в запрещённой социальной сети🔥🔥🔥 Очень странные противоречивые чувства от восторга до страха и тревожности, что и как делать дальше… Пока буду тестировать разные гипотезы. И искренне надеюсь, что это только начало, а не случайный выстрел)) Не переключайтесь!
❤2🔥2👍1
Долгое время стеклоблоки ассоциировались у нас с советскими заводами, и нужны были годы, чтобы материал реабилитировал себя Сегодня стеклоблоки - отличный вариант светопропускающей перегородки. Хорошо использовать в тех пространствах, где хочется, присутствия дневного света, но технической возможности проема или окна нет Посмотрите подборку, как дизайнеры применяют этот материал, это восторг! А вы бы хотели исполь…
😍3❤1👏1
Я просто обязана оставить это тут! Во-первых, такого отклика, пожалуй, не имела ни одна история в телеграм Кажется, теперь я знаю, какой контент вам нужен😂 Во-вторых, ИИ настолько беспощаден, что пока без людей с головой всё равно не обойтись И в третьих, меня всё еще интересует вопрос, кто тот человек, который отправил это на таргет, и какая с него конверсия😂
😁3💯1🔥1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @anna_o_designe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна о Дизайне” (@anna_o_designe), 63 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anna_o_designe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.