3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 08:25
61
-1
10 Aug 2026, 04:15
62
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:49
62
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.2%
avg views ÷ 61 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
18.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (19 April 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
16
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
15
50.0%
👍
9
30.0%
❤
5
16.7%
👏
1
3.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Два вечера, которые помогут навести порядок в целях и стратегии
В августе наш топовый управленец и наставник Анна Жерникова проведёт сразу два практических мастер-класса.
Их можно посетить по отдельности, а можно пройти оба, чтобы выстроить стратегию не только для бизнеса, но и для себя.
Анна — фасилитатор, бизнес-тренер, HR-руководитель с опытом более 15 лет. Среди её клиентов: МТС, СБЕР, Интер РАО, Пятёрочка, …
Анонс мастер-класса «Разборы личных целей и стратегии их достижения»
Если вы поставили себе большую желаемую цель, но путь к ее реализации не понятен, не хватает четкого понимания «Что делать?» и «Как?», то приглашаем вас на мастер-класс с живым разбором личной стратегии достижения цели.
4 августа в 14 МСК на мастер-классе сделаем разбор вашей цели и создадим стратегию ее достижения.
Проработаем ключевые точки:
Мисси…
1. У меня изменения - это сразу 5 тренировок в неделю, если хочу похудеть.40%
2. У меня изменения это средняя по тяжести работа и много попыток (10 раз бросал курить с НГ)20%
3. Я верю в малые и лёгкие шаги. Регулярно практикую.60%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как изменить хоть что-то в своей жизни
В перерывах между командными сессиями и другими задачами читаем книгу Маурера "Метод кайдзен".
Про совершенствование путем не мега бурной деятельности с понедельника, а ежедневных очень простых шагов.
Очень трогательно читать про те перемены, которые случаются с людьми, сделавшими маленькие шаги - бросили курить, стали меньше есть и сбросили вес, начали заниматься спортом, …
Прослушала книгу биографию Петра Ильича Чайковского Нины Берберовой.
3 инсайта которые задели за живое:
1. До 25 лет он вообще не собирался быть композитором. И близкое окружение ему говорило - "ты не годишься..".
Вера в себя❤️
2. В моем понимании, Пётр Ильич был и самозанятым и предпринимателем.
И оперы и балеты были таким же продуктом, как стратегические сессии, например. Написал, там не оценили/не приняли, а та…
Как стратсессия помогла IT-компании выстроить доверие и достичь 74% годовой цели в первом полугодии
Заказчиком сессии выступил исполнительный директор одной из IT-компаний Новосибирска. Продуктовая разработка, более 70 сотрудников, имя на рынке.
Большая цель в деньгах была понятна, но был вопрос – как ее достичь, как показать собственнику результат. И запрос был не только про цели и стратегию. Критичный барьер был…
Когда компании нужна стратегическая сессия?
Часто компаниям не нужна еще одна обычная планерка.
Иногда нужен формат, в котором команда наконец договаривается о целях, приоритетах и ответственности.
Стратегическая сессия нужна бизнесу, если:
1. У лидера есть большие цели, но команда действует разрозненно.
2. Руководители спорят о приоритетах и тянут в разные стороны.
3. У компании есть планы, но нет понятной дорожн…
Друзья мои, к вам вопрос💡
Из моего ли канала, из других ли источников, у вас есть понимание, для чего компаниям могут быть нужны стратегические сессии?
Поделитесь мнением, пожалуйста 🙏😊
Сессия по решению проблем
⚡Кейс: в компании есть острая проблема.
И руководитель может решать её сам, в одного. И ответственность за решение тоже - сам. Но один в поле не воин..
А можно - иначе.
✅️ Решение: провести направленный Мозговой штурм - обсуждение и выработку решений проблемы всей командой, и итогом которого будет - четкий план действий с задачами, сроками и ФИО ответственных.
Этапы Мозгового штурма:
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anna_hr_fasilitator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
1. У меня изменения - это сразу 5 тренировок в неделю, если хочу похудеть.40%
2. У меня изменения это средняя по тяжести работа и много попыток (10 раз бросал курить с НГ)20%
3. Я верю в малые и лёгкие шаги. Регулярно практикую.60%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Внимание, вОпрос🌟
Зачем компаниям могут быть нужны стратегические сессии?
Я понимаю✅️67%
Нет, не понятно⚡0%
50/50 примерно🤪33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Жерникова Стратегия бизнеса” (@anna_hr_fasilitator), 61 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anna_hr_fasilitator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
